Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Navigating RTO. seeking perspective

Hey all - open question herewith, not a complaint.
I've been at Intel for a while, love my team, and I'm trying to be objective about this. The new 4-day-a-week office policy is what it is. It’s the chatter about stricter presence monitoring - badge tracking, logins, VPN activity - that has me wondering. I'm not trying to game the system, just trying to understand: where’s the line between reasonable oversight and micromanagement that ki-ls morale?

I’m not looking to leave, so I'd rather learn from those who've gone through a similar shift or heard from your friends in other big tech companies. What felt reasonable, and what became unbearable? Was there a transparent conversation about what data was collected and why? Did these policies actually help collaboration, or just add a layer of stress?
I'm not anti office; I just believe work should be measured by results and trust, not by clock watching. Any practical tips for talking to a manager or HR about this? Or examples of balanced policies you've seen elsewhere?
Thanks for any honest input.


by
| 3201 views | | 13 replies (last July 30) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k17xfgjn

13 replies (most recent on top)

@hw This is correct, but the accuracy can be changed.
Turn off location services and the phone relies on triangulation. Still somewhat accurate, but not pinpoint

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j0+1k17xfgjn

Try using the GPS-enabled map on your phone, or in your car.

Most cars can link to the phone and display the map on the dashboard.

If you drive an older vehicle, then see if you can get your phone to describe in audio how to get to the office.

To get home, you can either get a new set of directions or set up a new route.

I use Google Maps but there are many other apps which can help with this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hw+1k17xfgjn

@bj There's quite a difference between an opinion and well known facts. It is a well known fact that most humans, in general, will put in minimal effort when at all possible. You'd have a better time convincing someone the sky is green.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f3+1k17xfgjn

It's just math.

As the company gets smaller, the effort of each individual is more noticeable.

Considering the additional spin offs and other asset sales that are coming, plus the amount of outsourcing which is right from the Cadence playbook, Intel is likely on a path to 40k headcount, and virtually every single one of them will be under performance monitoring.

It has been decades since the company was that small, so none of the current workers know what that is like. Andy Grove was Andy Grove because he led a relatively small workforce and so could mostly know what they were all doing.

That is what is coming, and it will over time weed out all those who are not dedicated to the task. As the finances improve, those who perform well in that environment should be nicely rewarded, but they will face much more competition for their job.

The company maintained excess capacity since the late 1990s, and that resulted in less compensation for most people, as the company found it increasingly difficult to pay for all that excess. LBT and the Board are now taking it in the other direction.

People who think the past few decades are the norm are in for a series of shocks, and likely to be walked in the process.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1k17xfgjn

LBT impacting his old ideology to this company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1k17xfgjn

This is all forgetful. In the good old days a decade or more ago management lacked AI tracking tools and didn’t have time to manually observe. Instead they went over your tasks with you and observed your progress, usually at a weekly 1:1. And it worked!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bq+1k17xfgjn

If your company leans on common attrition to meet headcount goals then you will feel it. Be strong :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bp+1k17xfgjn

@a2 "I have an opinion, and if you don't agree with it, then the'res something wrong with YOU."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bj+1k17xfgjn

Seems the RTO Troll is unsure how to continue the troll.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1k17xfgjn

Your question should be: how can I go on quiet quitting for as along as possible before the doors get boarded up?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1k17xfgjn

Managers will be given more objective data on your performance.
How many hours you were at the keyboard, how many hours in the office, etc etc.
May or may not translate to output or impact it is what it is. Kinds like how many comments you gave on a doc reviews shows your contribution.
AI will look at all this data eventually anyway and help your manager in your assessment to you.
So get ready to be monitored as part of this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1k17xfgjn

LBT said he was lonely and wants to see you in person.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k17xfgjn

It's more simple then you are giving credence to. Several things will happen. Non-loyal people and those with capricious nature will leave resulting in reduced OPEX and losing problem children. Most adults(using the term loosely) require supervision to perform their responsibilities to the minimum standard. If anyone is offended by that last statement then you should probably do some self reflection.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1k17xfgjn

Post a reply

: