Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

RIFs have a lot to do with age

I don't understand those who say that RIFs have nothing to do with age. Maybe they should rethink that one?

by
| 2231 views | | 7 replies (last November 7, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jxoLA61

7 replies (most recent on top)

Out with the old. In with the new. If you're over 50 I'd recommend dying your hair and getting a pair of skinny jeans. Lose the socks too. Just look to the CSuite for guidance on dressing to fit our culture and you will be fine. They don't want people who can't get a positive KD ratio in call of duty. Gamers only.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ucq+1jxoLA61

I agree that age had a lot to do with the decision to rif an employee. Probably because they made more money. But, that's going to happen when you work at a job for 20 years or more...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3evx+1jxoLA61

It is interesting that the only group not represented via a ESG is 55+ employees!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rtd+1jxoLA61

I agree. Since HR took control of who gets RIFd, salary, age, and race are now part of the equation for selecting who goes. Before HR got the reigns, you kept the people who could get the job done best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dyr+1jxoLA61

I could not get my payout either unless I agreed also last year. It is obvious that salary which usually comes with age is a major factor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lsw+1jxoLA61

I couldn’t get my payout until I signed a piece of paper, saying I would not sue the company
They have themselves covered

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kap+1jxoLA61

I had a director tell me once that his specialty was pushing out older and senior staff because they made too much money. It usually included a buy out amount that was too good to pass up. Ageism is real and I’m most of the structured payoffs on the wireless side I’ve been made aware of people suing and winning cases because of it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @isk+1jxoLA61

Post a reply

: