Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Sound familiar - META layoffs

Meta began layoffs this week with the aim of eliminating low-performers, but several employees who were let go told Business Insider they were “blindsided,” saying they had received positive midyear reviews. Some voiced concerns about future job opportunities, given the layoffs were publicized as targeting underperformers. However, internal documents viewed by BI showed that higher performing employees would also be targeted if managers couldn’t meet workforce reduction goals with lower performers alone.
Meta also fired high performers in its performance management efficiency play that left about 3,600 employees jobless on Monday.

Impacted employees received a terse email early Monday morning telling them they’d lost their jobs and guiding them towards a “Meta alumni” website.

Some employees who had been hitting or exceeding expectations were part of the group, according to reporting by Business Insider and Entrepreneur.

Now departing employees fear the repercussions of the “low performer” label hampering their job search.

But it sounds like this is not just happening at Meta.

Others are reporting this performance management layoff tactic happening at other companies, and some have said many experienced workers have been the targets.

by
| 791 views | | 8 replies (last February 13, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jky7r59b

8 replies (most recent on top)

I don't think it matters, Too much fat in ATT management from top to bottom. Lots of room to streamline. Thats the bottom line, all feelings aside.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1jky7r59b

At&T and Meta are NOT comparable companies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ce+1jky7r59b

Business sales they are targeting tenured sellers to bring in new hires at a fraction of the salary. They’re trying to undo the past pay scales at the detriment of loyal employees who’ve done nothing wrong but perform over the years. It’s sickening.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1jky7r59b

Once the company gets people to quit and retire due to RTO , (and haven’t reached the number they want), they will begin looking at 3 years history in ratings and terminate low performers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jky7r59b

Which is worse

  1. getting laid off as a top performer in the "low performers" round?
  2. getting laid off because you got a bad zipcode?
  3. moving to Dallas and then get laid off?
  4. having to stay and work here until they shut the lights out?

Think about it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jky7r59b

They were probably WFH doing nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jky7r59b

“Sound familiar - META layoffs
Meta began layoffs this week with the aim of eliminating low-performers”

No, it doesn’t sound familiar at all. T has been laying off targeted employees under Johns instruction that we have to get younger. Can’t wait to him and his bozo CTO in front of congress answering to their suspected civil rights violations. Keep squirming guys.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jky7r59b

Doesn’t sound familiar at all, no.

Based on what I have seen on this forum, everyone that’s been laid off here is a top performer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jky7r59b

Post a reply

: