It’s not easy to align varied stakeholders to a common value when those are not being demonstrated by leadership themselves.
HS and RR, for instance: there is an unsaid disdain for generalists being daft and specialists being arrogant.
Within Sales, there is power play between sales, consulting managers and consultants. While regional sales directors wanted to empower consulting, Americas wanted to take account management and pass it on to their long time farmers given the powerplay between sales and consulting director. Does the Sales Director have the courage to clean up her org? Add the ops team wanting to control budgets and be the kingmakers.
Within IBS, specialists, PS, Analytics support and product have their own internal dynamics. PS tends to look down on “support”, Analytics support looks down on account management. COE’s battling for control over support.
ES - misaligned and inefficient for regions. Pompous given the SCG history despite the ownership falling back to regions. Backstabbing is most accepted here after IBS. They’ll do it while smiling at you and gaslight with such finesse, nothing is ever done poorly by them.
A consistently client centric and values based approach was only exhibited by Dealmakers. Credit to GS? Perhaps.
Ex CFO knew the excess could have been managed far better. She also nudged the CEO to make decisions he didn’t want to but those that were necessary. HS is better at managing up, built more trust up even though one can call her bankrupt in terms of followership.
People officer inspires zero trust. Reeks of prejudice. Weakest function in terms of talent management and L&D. Old, dysfunctional leadership across this group who are in it for the ease and comfort rather than a desire to contribute meaningfully.
With such a weak and divided ELT, is it a surprise that the ones reporting to them are also self serving? Substance left this firm a long time ago. What’s left are power hungry people who unfortunately cannot manage power well.