Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

What would the stock value of AT&T be if it didn’t lose 150 billion dollars with failed mergers and acquisitions if the price of the stock is 22

To calculate the hypothetical stock price of AT&T if it hadn’t lost $150 billion due to failed mergers and acquisitions:

Known Information:

  1. Current stock price: $22.67
  2. Current market capitalization (approx.): $162.8 billion
  3. Outstanding shares: ~7.18 billion shares
  4. Hypothetical increase in market cap: +$150 billion

Steps:

  1. Adjusted market cap:



  1. Adjusted stock price:




Conclusion:

If AT&T hadn’t lost $150 billion, the stock price could potentially be around $43.56, assuming no other significant changes in the market.

by Anonymous
| 1041 views | | 17 replies (last January 9, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jgvkqxrw
Comment! It's anonymous!

17 replies (most recent on top)

Then imagine if we would of spent that money on something smart,like putting conduit and fiber in the ground.....

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @t1+1jgvkqxrw

$11.00

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @jd+1jgvkqxrw

Stock price would be at least $400.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @he+1jgvkqxrw

Stankey and Stephenson are the biggest corporate criminals of 21st century.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @c8+1jgvkqxrw

Two men, devalued the company by 50% and they’re still in control.

Unfckingbelievable!

Permitted to continue his reign of dysfunction and failure.

Just unfckingreal

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1jgvkqxrw

“And we have all been here and said nothing until now. We are also to blame”

We?! Since when do us “worker bee’s” have a (genuine) say in C suite decisions or “strategy”?!

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1jgvkqxrw

If John Hayes was not cheated out of the President & CEO instead of Ed Whithead because Ed promised Zane Bobo a job due to his divorce loss. $105.93

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1jgvkqxrw

Additional assumption , The Stank was fired 15 years ago........Stock Price = $57

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jgvkqxrw

Regardless, the money to service the debt could be paid as dividends, the return to stock holders would be greater; then the stock price would be higher.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1jgvkqxrw

"All the people who created this unfathomable debt are still here, and leading. Hmmmmm"

And we have all been here and said nothing until now. We are also to blame,

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jgvkqxrw

It’s actually more than 50%. It would be a 100% gain from this point. Plus imagine all the fiber we could have already put in the ground over the same time period. Instead of LOSING it all. It’s insane when you really break it down. Will be used as a case study in college finance/business classes for the rest of time.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jgvkqxrw

All the people who created this unfathomable debt are still here, and leading. Hmmmmm

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jgvkqxrw

$666/share

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jgvkqxrw

I love when people do math like this. It is appalling that there has been no accountability and even worse that they see no problem. YOLO I guess.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jgvkqxrw

Also our fearless leader is getting handsomely compensated. Employees and shareholders should request clawback to pay down debt. Do you agree (hit like)? If not, why?

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jgvkqxrw

I know what will fix this.

If I force everyone into the office 5 days a week, it will resolve all of those failed acquisitions!

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jgvkqxrw

I think we should allow the same person who devalued the company by 50% to lead. He wants to do a stock buyback instead of paying off debt. Genius!

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jgvkqxrw

Post a reply

: