Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Should a corporation with 130 billion in debt perform a stock buyback?

Whether a corporation with $130 billion in debt should perform a stock buyback depends on several key factors, including its financial health, cash flow, debt structure, and overall strategic goals. Here are the considerations:

  1. Financial Health and Liquidity

• Cash Reserves: Does the company have sufficient cash on hand to cover its operations, capital expenditures, and debt obligations? If a stock buyback depletes critical cash reserves, it might not be wise.
• Free Cash Flow: Does the company generate enough free cash flow after covering expenses and debt service to justify the buyback?

  1. Cost of Debt vs. Cost of Equity

• Low-Interest Debt: If the corporation’s debt has a low interest rate, servicing it may not be a significant burden, making a buyback potentially more justifiable.
• Opportunity Cost: Compare the return on investment of the buyback (e.g., boosting EPS or shareholder value) to the benefits of paying down debt.

  1. Leverage Ratios

• Debt-to-Equity Ratio: A high debt load can strain leverage ratios, impacting the company’s credit rating and borrowing costs. Performing a buyback while highly leveraged could signal poor financial discipline.
• Interest Coverage Ratio: Can the company comfortably cover its interest payments? If not, a buyback might worsen financial risk.

  1. Market Conditions

• Undervalued Stock: If the company believes its stock is undervalued, a buyback could make sense to create shareholder value.
• Signal to Investors: Buybacks can indicate confidence in the company’s prospects but may backfire if investors see it as reckless.

  1. Long-Term Strategy

• Investment Opportunities: Could the funds for the buyback be better used for growth, acquisitions, or other value-creating investments?
• Debt Reduction: Paying down debt could improve the balance sheet and reduce financial risk, potentially providing more stability and flexibility.

  1. Regulatory and Stakeholder Considerations

• Tax Implications: Recent tax laws, such as a tax on buybacks, might make them less attractive.
• Stakeholder Perception: How will employees, regulators, and the public view a buyback amid significant debt?

Conclusion

If the company is financially strong, generates ample free cash flow, and sees its stock as undervalued, a buyback might be justifiable. However, with $130 billion in debt, the company should weigh the risks of increasing leverage and potentially damaging its creditworthiness. A thorough cost-benefit analysis and consideration of long-term financial stability are crucial.

by
| 1281 views | | 20 replies (last January 5, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jgqctwdw

20 replies (most recent on top)

Another entitled strategy to enrich themselves while sticking it to the unvalued employees. Pajama Stankey and crew are wanting their compensation sooner than later because they will be pulling ripcords soon. This strategy allows them to be compensated much quicker than waiting out revenue increase from building out the fiber/mobility network and infrastructure.

Now go RTO and either like it or quit, Stinky would say because others are waiting overseas to take your job at much reduced rates. Globalist at work!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hr+1jgqctwdw

I'm 130 Billion in Debt but I just bought some stock because I want to

  1. Boost my earnings per share. ( I had none before now I have some)
  2. I wanted to boost my dividend without actually boosting my dividend after cutting it annually since 2020.
  3. I want to signal that I have confidence in my future despite bone crushing debt.
  4. I want to increase ownership in my own debt
  5. I want to increase ROE and Price per earnings without actually impacting my massive debt which would skyrocket both numbers
  6. After cutting dividends routinely for the past several years I want to offer shareholders a higher dividend that is not sustainable over time.
  7. I want to offset the stock program I offer to my officer class employees who have guided me to finding 130 Billion in Debt - they are the real pot of gold under the rainbow.
  8. Tax benes - since most investors are D-mb ASF they won't sell their stock or realize this short term gain and therefore won't be taxed on the growth.
  9. Since buybacks only help those with an exit strategy there's not really a #9 here.

dumfuks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h2+1jgqctwdw

What a bunch of id--ts. Let the stock go up 30% and then jump in front of the parade like you’re leading it. SBC way.. buy high and sell low. It’s Just like Biden refilling the strategic petroleum reserves with oil at $100 a barrel. The stupidity of the SBC clown show never ceases to amaze me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ee+1jgqctwdw

Don't worry about the buyback. It's all part of running a company. Let the big boys do their thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1jgqctwdw

Stankey kept a lot of workers employed. Good pay. Good benefits.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e0+1jgqctwdw

I saw the word "debt" and just wet my pants.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1jgqctwdw

“ Simple answer: no. No they should not.”

Spot on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dn+1jgqctwdw

The question depends on the interest rate on the debt, versus the inflation rate. A lot of this debt was incurred in a lower interest rate environment. Now, government debt is rising at a rate that would seem to require an inflationary environment to deal with, because inflation cheapens debt. And AT&T gets to go along for the ride.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @de+1jgqctwdw

When you have 3 billion more outstanding shares than your closest competitor, it will take a lot more than $20billion to put a dent in it.
With that mo yes, they can purchase roughly 1 billion shares. So they need $60billion to be equal to Verizon’s outstanding shares.
Add that on to the current debt, then explain to me how $20billion will move the stock.
T has a decade long project to correct previous missteps.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d0+1jgqctwdw

Absolutely yes!

It enriches the Stink tremendously!

The worse CEO in US history needs the $

Stink is the worse POS in US business history!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cx+1jgqctwdw

If concerned about financial irregularities, why do you stay?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cs+1jgqctwdw

AT&T buying back their own stock with this much debt load on the books is analogous to a chimpanzee that has a barrel of bananas purchased with a loan, then sells a couple of bananas and takes the proceeds to put a fresh coat of paint on the barrel.

This is fitting because like T, chimpanzees are known for sporadic, jittery, erratic behavior, with a group-think, monkee-see, monkee-do mindset, slapping their chests as their only leverage of ill-perceived dominance over their employee captives. Little did the chimp Stink and little chimp Legg realize that the captives are peeling open the bananas so they rot in place. Poor chimps.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1jgqctwdw

Yes they want the stock price to increase from a buyback and thus their compensation packages, End of story! This is just another entitled bite out of the shrinking apple.

Don’t care how low interest rates are, 130 billion of leveraged debt has put At&T in a tenuous unstable position because the economy, markets or war can change things violently which, will affect sales , free cash flow, etc. Enron and WorldComm failed fairly quickly as examples.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1jgqctwdw

Yes. Stock buybacks are good for the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1jgqctwdw

Someone has been using ASKATT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jgqctwdw

Stock buyback just boosts executive bonuses as it raises the stock price. Their bonus is tied to the stock price. Don’t read into it any further. You’re welcome.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jgqctwdw

Thanks, ChatGPT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jgqctwdw

What are the benefits of a stock buyback

A stock buyback (or share repurchase) occurs when a company buys back its own shares from the market. Here are the key benefits of a stock buyback:

  1. Boosts Earnings Per Share (EPS)

• Reducing the number of outstanding shares increases the earnings allocated to each share. This often makes the company appear more profitable on a per-share basis, which can attract investors and potentially increase the stock price.

  1. Returns Capital to Shareholders

• Buybacks provide an alternative to dividends for returning excess cash to shareholders. Unlike dividends, buybacks allow shareholders to choose whether to sell their shares or hold onto them.

  1. Signals Confidence

• A buyback signals to the market that the company believes its stock is undervalued, indicating management’s confidence in the business’s future prospects.

  1. Increases Ownership Stake of Remaining Shareholders

• By reducing the total number of shares, existing shareholders’ ownership percentage in the company increases, potentially leading to greater long-term gains.

  1. Improves Financial Ratios

• Return on Equity (ROE): Buybacks reduce equity, potentially improving ROE, a key metric for investors.
• Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: A lower number of outstanding shares often reduces the P/E ratio, making the stock appear more attractive.

  1. Flexibility Compared to Dividends

• Stock buybacks are discretionary and can be executed as management sees fit, whereas cutting dividends is often viewed negatively by investors. This flexibility allows companies to adjust their capital return strategies based on market conditions.

  1. Offsets Dilution

• Buybacks can offset the dilution caused by stock-based compensation for employees or other share issuances, maintaining the value of existing shares.

  1. Tax Advantages

• In some jurisdictions, buybacks may have more favorable tax treatment than dividends. For example, shareholders only realize capital gains if they sell their shares, while dividends are typically taxed when received.

  1. Potential to Support Stock Price

• By reducing supply and increasing demand, buybacks can help support or increase the stock price, benefiting investors who hold their shares.

Risks to Consider

While buybacks have benefits, they can also signal poor capital allocation if the stock is overvalued, or if the company sacrifices investments, debt reduction, or long-term stability to fund them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jgqctwdw

Now if it were me, I’d just pay down debt, cover operating expenses and invest in the company but what do I know.

Remember how past bonuses were tied to free cash flow. It’s what they needed to do this buy back so they could artificially inflate the stock price they destroyed.

Can’t prove to wallstreet that you can afford the buyback if you can’t hit your numbers. So that’s it. That’s the why behind all of this. The stock buyback that they hope will raise the price of the stock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jgqctwdw

Simple answer: no. No they should not

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jgqctwdw

Post a reply

: