Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

TAs and Chief of Staffs - For outside public

If intel’s management has even been serious about savings cost and removing inefficiencies, they would have removed TAs (technical assistants) and chief of staff positions.

Anyone at VP and above level at intel qualifies to hire a TA. There are many VPs. In addition, in the recent years, bad leaders such as Raja created another useless layer called chief of staff. It is very common to see Chief of Staff, TAs and RAs reporting to SVP and higher positions. As many people know these jobs are no more than glorified admin jobs.

At intel, this job category is so pervasive and so protected that some employees make a career out of being a TA. There are people who stay in TA, chief of staff jobs 8,10 years or longer or move from one TA position to another.

For intel investors and outsiders, don’t buy intel management efficiency actions. These are ways for them to clean employees they don’t want. Most of the actions are unfair just read employment related lawsuits filed against Intel.

TAs, chief of staff - essentially glorified admins - at intel are paid extremely handsomely. They are paid just below Vp levels. Initially these positions were created to help groom next generation leaders but as I highlighted it is a secure career track with no real deliverables today. As an employee, I find them adding negative value to intel. As a political group, you need to involve them, educate them. Their personal preference towards you determines whether you get access to Vp+ or not. In some cases, TA positions are ways for corrupt leaders (i.e. Raja, Randhir) to hire and promote their favorites irrespective of merit, experience etc.

by
| 2215 views | | 7 replies (last October 15, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jb9zn3h

7 replies (most recent on top)

@1kwb+1jb9zn3h The TA system is primarily a gate-keeper system, part of the highly politicized culture at Intel where clowns and political careerists in engineering can climb the ranks by swapping favors with TA’s to feed snake oil to MBA/non-technical VP, who obviously have no idea how to sort the wheat from the chaff.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the second brain concept which was Andy Grove’s goal when he invented the TA system.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fbr+1jb9zn3h

I am sorry but anyone who is serious about her or his career would never work as a TA. Evertime someone mentions how useless these positions are and wasting so much $$$ and time, causing inefficiencies for Intel, a bunch of TAs respond and explain how difficult their life was working as a TA. Cry me a river. Please do not kid us. We are insiders.

TA positions at intel add zero value and those so called ELT members have thousands of workers under them. They do not need another glorified admin. I mean seriously. No other company other than Intel and similar wasteful corporations have these types of useless jobs.

When I attend executive meetings in RNB, most often the required meeting attendees can’t find seats at the table because of TAs. Most TAs never listen or add any value but as politically oriented group, TAs are coached to sit at the table and have face time with execs. Some of them take notes - very strange why, aren’t their execs listening the discussion. It is distracting. So meetings are like freaking United Nations meetings.no wonder why our meetings are so useless.

TAs are gate keepers. You have to treat them, educate them, be nice to them - all useless, zero value add to our work in order to work with their execs.

I usually pass candidates when I see on their resume they wasted their careers working as TAs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ecf+1jb9zn3h

Didn't a previous CEO get fired because an employee held the "staff of Chief" between cheeks?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jvm+1jb9zn3h

TAs for ELT members is an essential role - these are 5000+ people orgs and the executive needs support to run these large orgs with complex issues around organization, finance, legal, etc. However, only ELT members justify having these support roles.

Problem #1 : Too many VPs (some VPs have just 10-20 direct reports)
Solution : Half the VPs should be fired.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kwb+1jb9zn3h

Navin Shenoy was TA to Paul_O, before he was CEO. Career is on fast track.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1trq+1jb9zn3h

"I was a water boy. Therefore, "waterboy"-ing is an awesome role!"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yla+1jb9zn3h

I was a TA at Intel, supporting two VPs simultaneously. It was the most stressful yet rewarding two years of my 21 year intel career. I can assure you my pay was no where near that of the VPs I supported, in fact I was a grade 8 during my TA days. Yes there were bad TAs and those bad TAs often had trouble landing jobs after their TA gig was up. Good TAs typically had a broader range of job offers after their 2 years . Are there too many TA / COS at intel? Well maybe a better question is “are there too many VPs at Intel?”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bbw+1jb9zn3h

Post a reply

: