Thread regarding Ford layoffs

(CNBC) GM delays return-to-office mandate after employee backlash

  • General Motors is conducting damage control around its return-to-office plans after a
    Friday afternoon message to employees spurred backlash and confusion.
  • The company’s senior leadership team on Friday said corporate workers would be
    required to return to physical locations at least three days a week, beginning later this
    year.

*. On Tuesday, a second message walked back that timing and clarified the policy.

DETROIT – General Motors is conducting damage control around its return-to-office plans after a Friday afternoon message to employees spurred backlash and confusion.

The company’s senior leadership team on Friday said corporate workers would be required to return to physical locations at least three days a week, beginning later this year, in what the company called an evolution of its current remote work policies.

On Tuesday, a second message walked back that timing and clarified the company won’t be mandating specific in-office days, instead leaving that decision to individual teams.

“Our plan was always, and still is, collaboratively design the solution that best balances the needs of the enterprise with the needs of each of you,” read the memo, signed by CEO Mary Barra and other executives, a copy of which was viewed by CNBC.

The follow-up message says no workers will be required to return to offices sooner than the first quarter of next year.

“While we have maintained a highly collaborative culture over the past two years during a very challenging time, the intangible benefits of in person collaboration are going to be a critical success factor as we move into a period of rapid launches,” the Tuesday message said. “This evolution is about being ready for the next phase of our transformation.”

A GM spokeswoman confirmed the authenticity of the message, saying it sought to “provide more clarify to help answer some of the questions and concerns that we’ve been receiving.” She said the timing of the return-to-office has shifted, but “the overall plan has not really changed.”

Both messages are a stark change from the automaker’s flexible “work appropriately” rules that were announced by Barra and lauded by the automaker in April 2021. The company described it as a flexible, evolving policy that will differ depending on the employee, week and project.

GM on Tuesday apologized for the timing of the original message and its vagueness and said the earlier communication was sent out after some information about the company’s plan was prematurely shared with some departments.

“We elected to communicate enterprise wide before we had the opportunity to collaborate more broadly on the implementation plan. We believe the benefits of being transparent – even with suboptimal timing and partial details – outweighed the risk of creating mistrust by having you hear the information second hand,” the Tuesday message reads.

GM said it will communicate more information at the end of next month, as the company intends to spend the “next few weeks continuing to listen to your feedback so that we incorporate it into our implementation plans.”

by
| 1764 views | | 7 replies (last September 29, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1iVCMUOg

7 replies (most recent on top)

This reasoning says it all, "...the intangible benefits of in person collaboration..." IE - pulling excuses out of where the sun don't shine.

If there is actual benefit, then it's measurable. These intangible benefits are worth just as much as if they'd said they'd be happier/less lonely seeing random people in the same general vicinity. Might be true, but no excuse for forcing others into showing up when they'd really rather not spend the time or transportation costs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rkb+1iVCMUOg

@1xfl+1iVCMUOg

That coupled with the fact that companies are going need to be able to articulate the specific reasons people need to be hybrid vs. 100% on site. So far I've read some pretty nutty things from CEO's on why this has to be the case - getting fresh baked cookies from colleagues about takes the cake. I think, however, more of it will revert to, "If we can't physically see you, you must not be working or we need to physically see you in order to promote you." As we've seen with mass firings, it's super easy to get rid of people so there shouldn't be much in the way of letting people WFH 100% of the time. If they're not working and producing, they're gone but a secondary reason also arises from having to fill these brand new empty buildings. Indeed, Ford will act in the best interest of the enterprise as a whole, which probably will not equate to making employees as productive as possible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1llb+1iVCMUOg

@1kgj+1iVCMUOg trust and management are not synonymous with each other at Ford Motor Company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1afy+1iVCMUOg

WFH will ki-l companies that don’t set strict guidelines…especially where some employees are required 100% on site and others aren’t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xfl+1iVCMUOg

Ford may act independently of GM. But Ford is lockstep with Tesla. RTO is coming because Farley follows Musk. Bank it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wsk+1iVCMUOg

Luckily, Ford acts independently of GM. I trust our management will act in the best interest of the enterprise as a whole.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kgj+1iVCMUOg

And?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uoz+1iVCMUOg

Post a reply

: