Thread regarding Thomson Reuters layoffs

Breaking Colorado’s Transparency Law

There are several remote positions listed among the 1200 current open roles.

However, those that are remote do not show salary information upfront.

I believe this is a violation of Colorado’s pay transparency law.

Wonder why a company with so many lawyers doesn’t want to follow the law?

by
| 1892 views | | 3 replies (last December 29, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1eq8uZ6t

3 replies (most recent on top)

Looks like NYC has a law going into effect in April of 22. There are quite a few employees in NYC

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-york-city-employers-will-be-8283408/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7vjj+1eq8uZ6t

There is no office there but there are employees there. There are some field sales positions where the employees live in Colorado.

HR if you are reading this, which you are, why don’t you post the salary range for the remote positions? Why break the law and endanger the company and your job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cez+1eq8uZ6t

According to one resource -

"The Transparency Rules and Job Postings
Recently, numerous national news outlets covered stories of employers reluctant to comply with Colorado's new transparency rules. Some employers have even reportedly tried to get around the Colorado transparency rules by explicitly excluding from consideration Colorado applicants. However, this strategy is not a failsafe. The bottom line is that compliance with the transparency rules is required in a job posting as long as the employer has at least one Colorado employee at the time of publication, and the job is tied to a location in Colorado or is advertised as being remote."

There isn't a Colorado office. So, anyone in Colorado now is more likely to see their role eliminated than TR to follow this requirement. Jobs are moving from the US so all these pesky fair hiring, transparency, and DEI requirements will go away.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ofn+1eq8uZ6t

Post a reply

: