I have been constructively discharged. It is called leaving on your own from a job that s_cked.
9 replies (most recent on top)
Post ID: @ygb+1ekISwih
Actually, Wells Fargo employees have won several class action lawsuits against Wells Fargo.
So apparently, they have not always “thought of these things and have been very careful to proceed in a way that is still legal, even if its unfavorable?”
One thing you can always count on at Wells Fargo is that management’s greed (or ignorance) and need to please the next layer up will always supersede doing things right.
Yawn
Can you get me out of a speeding ticket? Sounds like maybe you can.
key words being "that a reasonable employer would realize that a reasonable person in the employee's position would be compelled to resign". When many companies are doing the same, it's not hard to ki-l that attempt in court.
You think about all of the other banks doing this, even ones our CEO has worked at, and no one has been successful in suing them and winning? You think they haven't thought of these things and have been very careful to proceed in a way that is still legal, even if its unfavorable?
Good to see the actual law. Thanks @jyf+1ekISwih
Pretty clear that WF violates a couple of these, at least for some people (but not for most people).
Of the small percentage of people for whom this is applicable, it's very likely that only a miniscule subset of them will actually take action on these items. No doubt the Leadership has already taken that into account as a "cost of doing business".
Some people will certainly come out ahead on this, but in the grand scheme of things it's not even a blip on the financial radar.
Like having you travel 45 minutes to work out of an office for 2-3 hours for no reason.
Ok legal amateurs. Let’s have at it.
👇🏼
United States Law
In the United States, constructive discharge is a general term describing the involuntary resignation of an employee.[1] There is no single federal or state law against constructive dismissal in general. From a legal standpoint, it occurs when an employee is forced to resign because of intolerable working conditions which violate employment legislation, such as:[2]
Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA)
Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA)
Change in schedules in order to force employee to quit (title 12)
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA)
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA)
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)
Any state employment law
An employer showing favoritism to another employee without reason or explanation
The burden of proof in constructive dismissal cases lies with the employee.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has provided a 3-part test to determine whether or not a constructive discharge has occurred: (1) a reasonable person in the complainant's position would have found the working conditions intolerable; (2) conduct that constituted discrimination against the complainant created the intolerable working conditions; and (3) the complainant's involuntary resignation resulted from the intolerable working conditions.[3]
In California, the California Supreme Court defines constructive discharge as follows:
"In order to establish a constructive discharge, an employee must plead and prove, by the usual preponderance of the evidence standard, that the employer either intentionally created or knowingly permitted working conditions that were so intolerable or aggravated at the time of the employee's resignation that a reasonable employer would realize that a reasonable person in the employee's position would be compelled to resign."
I'm sure WF is too slick to make mistakes amounting to 'Constructive Dismissal' with lawyers running their smear campaigns.