What is to be gained, though? Let's discuss it - it was a good question.
Scenario 1: Leaving with all cards on the table
-
Grievances are completely aired
-
Individuals feel attacked, bad blood is formed
-
Leave is chaotic and transitions may be incomplete
-
Method of leave may have impacts with references, or with prospective employers with ties to Enbridge folks
-
A month later, for Enbridge it's business as usual
Scenario 2 - An orderly exit is chosen
-
Grievances are unaired
-
Transitions are carefully managed
-
References and inter-company exchanges are untainted
-
A month later, for Enbridge it's business as usual
What does the moral high ground achieve beyond your own personal satisfaction? I wouldn't even call it the moral high ground. To me it sounds like a descent into the muck. The moral high ground would be occupied by comporting yourself well, no matter the case for others.
I leave this with the example of the leader whose position I had to annex when the first tranches of layoffs began. He was pretty certain he was on the chopping block, and when Monday came, he was escorted out.
On the Friday before, he cleaned out his office, organized all legal agreements and documents, and left a series of notes explaining everything that was in flight, who the contacts were, and what to watch for.
I hold him as the gold standard of exiting well.