Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Constant reorgs

Can somebody tell me what's the point of constant reorgs? We've had how many in the past five years? Has any one of them done us any good? Let's be honest, it's just pointless shuffling and reshuffling done to justify the endless reductions in force. There is no big vision or plan here, there's just an alibi.

by
| 2053 views | | 13 replies (last September 24, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1cYPXhIQ

13 replies (most recent on top)

All you cynics will be amazed how Agile our CEO will be in Congress.
You can swat a fly, but not a gnat!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mga+1cYPXhIQ

I think management is having too much free time and got nothing to write for their PDS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1azj+1cYPXhIQ

It’s called “Churn”. Respect the “Churn”.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uab+1cYPXhIQ

Defund the reorganizing management funded organization.
Deorganizers unite!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kwu+1cYPXhIQ

The a-s clown managers have to pad their pds and justify their incompetent self worth.so glad to be getting out soon. Wish I knew if these lay off rumors associated with the Chevron merger were true or not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pwc+1cYPXhIQ

Reorg the Annandale boys down to the PERMIAN!! Need more field hands to be the CROWN JEWEL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hgg+1cYPXhIQ

Pay attention to Annandale (Clinton) ….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ipb+1cYPXhIQ

The band should continue to play & teams shall rearrange the deck chairs even though the titanic hit the ice burg

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @egv+1cYPXhIQ

Please don't interrupt our focus on realigning our business during these trying times. We have to schedule a pre-meeting to discuss the meeting we are going to have soon. All hands should be involved in color selection of the latest fonts for the new team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xnk+1cYPXhIQ

Management needs something to put o their review

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ndj+1cYPXhIQ

That’s one of the first signs the company is not performing well and is trying to figure out how to survive. Good luck

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rhe+1cYPXhIQ

@aul - I kind of agree with you, but it doesn’t have to be successful (obviously, otherwise it wouldn’t happen so frequently).

It is sometimes the only “achievement” that a senior manager can put on their performance review (along with attending hundreds of pointless meetings). The interesting thing is when you see a reorganisation that effectively reverses the last one, and you ask senior managers “So, does that mean that the last one was a mistake ?”, the stock response is “No - that was the circuit decision at the time”.

In other words, successive managers have to protect themselves by covering up for the mistakes of their predecessors. Total corruption and incompetence.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zur+1cYPXhIQ

Successful reorg = an entry on PDS

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aul+1cYPXhIQ

Post a reply

: