Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Re: the new fine and business restrictions- The bank’s incompetence flows from the top down.

Charlie is the same as Stumpf and Sloan - he is just a greedy horse of a different color.

Stumpf fostered a toxic sales culture which forced employees to open sham accounts on millions of customers. He knew there were problems, but he obscured and embellished the truth for years so he could keep the money train rolling for himself for as long as possible. Once exposed, he still tried to sell the idea that he was the only one who could fix it. Please. And yet he walked away with the cash, laughing all the way in to retirement.

Sloan attempted to falsely convince regulators and shareholders that the bank was transforming by launching new expensive marketing campaigns, rather than focusing on the actual regulatory work. But he did spend $42 Billion on company stock buybacks, enriching himself personally via his stock options. He walked away with the cash, laughing all the way in to retirement.

Scharf is all smoke and mirrors. He (rightfully so) criticizes our past CEOs, but he is nothing more than false promises and vague deadlines himself. Charlie says, again and again, that “Building an appropriate risk and control infrastructure has been and remains Wells Fargo’s top priority”. And yet he fails time and time again. Meanwhile he’s pulling another Tim Sloan spending $18 Billion on company stock buybacks to enrich himself via stock options. Mark my words, he’s going to keep the money train rolling for himself for as long as possible, obscuring and embellishing the truth regarding our progress on the federal asset cap. He will never successfully get us out from under it, but will walk away with the cash laughing all the way in to retirement.

by
| 2421 views | | 11 replies (last September 10, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1cLCat4U

11 replies (most recent on top)

He is the same color - just more botox and fillers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvn+1cLCat4U

OP is spot on. Charlie saw an opportunity to take advantage of a lazy BOD who was desperate to hire a new CEO after months of searching. He demanded outrageous pay, they said yes, and now we are stuck with him no matter how incompetent he is.

Truth be told, I think they will stick with him even as new scandals pop up under his time here. Charlie will be blaming all future problems on the old leadership for years to come. And he will get away with it. Our new expensive CEO is proving himself to be all talk, and no substance.

For those who don’t think CEOs are capable of deceiving investors and Boards through false and misleading claims, educate yourselves about Elizabeth Holmes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zzu+1cLCat4U

@wdy+1cLCat4U Who is the issue executive?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mak+1cLCat4U

I feel asleep. Thanks for the bold, reads like you're a psychopath.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fik+1cLCat4U

boring

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @exi+1cLCat4U

OP - You said it perfectly bubba.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vgu+1cLCat4U

Risk and business controls . Where is the Chief Control Executive and his issue executive today?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wdy+1cLCat4U

The whole company should have bk'd in 2016. It's a criminal enterprise...in my opinion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uzt+1cLCat4U

He-l to the yeah, OP gets it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @frq+1cLCat4U

Nice swan song, only read the bold.
Charlie will have the consent order lifted worry not, guy is smart.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @khd+1cLCat4U

Wrong OP. Corporate America has my best interests at heart. CNN says so, so it must be true!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ahp+1cLCat4U

Post a reply

: