Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

New Head of Consumer and Small Business Banking - CJ Tolkin

If you ever needed anymore proof of it doesn't matter how much you know, it only matters who you know, look no further than the recent announcement that CJ Tolkin or Conor Tolkin as Head of Consumer and Small Business Banking Finance. The son-in-law of the great Jamie Dimon, Charlie's long admired mentor, just got a major boost to his career, now reporting directly to CFO, Mike Santomassimo. Pretty amazing when for a guy that has at most 10 years of total experience in his professional career (graduated from Duke in 2011 with his undergraduate degree) but more likely closer to 8 years considering he went for his MBA at Harvard from 2016 to 2018 (highly doubtful he worked during those 2 years).

To analyze this further, currently there are 2 open positions listed under "Executives". One for Head of Underwriting and Credit Risk, which would be a high ranking position but not in the same class as Mr. Tolkin's, Head of Consumer and Small Business Banking finance position. The required qualifications for the Head of Underwriting and Credit Risk are 15+ years of lending experience and 10+ years of management experience. Now, keep in mind, this position is probably slightly lower in the high hierarchy of positions when compared to Mr. Tolkin's new position, yet Mr. Tolkin was somehow found to have enough experience to qualify for such a position.

At this point, it is safe to say, that if you were here under the old management, you are basically stuck in your position. There hasn't been one person within the company that has been given the opportunity for any of these executive level positions under Scharf and this recent announcement clearly shows it has nothing to do with your talent, skills, or years of experience. If you are someone with any ambition of moving up in the company, you are going to have to leave and start over. Management has made this clear as day. There is absolutely no saving face or coming back from this decision. It is outright sad that people that are overqualified for positions can't even get an interview, yet someone who is very clearly underqualified gets appointed to these executive positions without even a formal hiring process conducted for the position.

I'm sure some question along these lines will be asked for Charlie's town hall and it will get passed over, even if every single person in the company would only submit this question. Just remember, management only is targeting the "privileged" for any type of executive position.

by
| 15641 views | | 24 replies (last June 2) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1bVP3PQf

24 replies (most recent on top)

He was brought in to purge older women from the Consumer Bank. Layoffs that he tried to disguise through staggered timelines, and for the ‘workhorses’ who sacrificed their lives for a company that chose to make their lives miserable through public humiliation and other stunts (we had a support group in Consumer Bank Finance) it was devastating. I tried to file an EEOC complaint, but was told that Wells Fargo would find a way to fire me within two weeks. I dropped it but now that I’m retired I will be resurrecting it. The whole Dimon clan is dirty.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7t85+1bVP3PQf

Charlie & Santo fancy themselves as Dimon 2.0 & 3.0 respectively. However, bottom line is that they are petty, id--tic bullies without a long term vision and ability to inspire/lead a large organization. Good luck to Wells Fargo.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16zrb+1bVP3PQf

Wow is this scharfie’s answer to “not being able to find any minority talent out there?”what a great play for his “diversity and inclusion” efforts. Shame on our Board for allowing such blatant frat boy nepotism. This place is such a joke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1acl+1bVP3PQf

@wsn+1bVP3PQf

Charlie hired CJ Tolkin at BNY Mellon, he brought him to Wells when he became CEO. CJ was known as the snitch on the executive floor, would walk around and make sure people were working and report back to Charlie, now he's a department head.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nxc+1bVP3PQf

@ blb+1bVP3PQf that’s not what “professional assignment” means at at. It’s a non-guaranteed role for normally up to two years for former mid-senior level management who could no longer hack it in their job but still possess enough institutional knowledge to add some value on high profile initiatives. At the end of the contract, if no open slots, they are displaced.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lct+1bVP3PQf

What announcement? it's not anywhere on TW.

CJ shows as "CSBB business execution"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ypd+1bVP3PQf

Layoff peons to hire your SIL.

Zero self awareness

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @czt+1bVP3PQf

Apparently CS hired him in late 2019.

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/at-wells-fargo-one-time-dimon-protege-hires-dimon-s-son-in-law-1.1396317

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wsn+1bVP3PQf

@zwo

You’re right. No way to prove it. But they’ve got to know that no reasonably intelligent person can’t see the clear nepotism here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hqt+1bVP3PQf

Professional Assignment at WF means you are getting paid a huge base, huge target, LTI, stock options… he basically will get reviewed by Chainsaw and given a staggering portfolio of compensation….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @blb+1bVP3PQf

@njv+1bVP3PQf

I'm not saying that didn't happen, it probably did, but I'm also seeing no evidence to support it. They very well may have gone through the motions of a formal hiring process, interviewing some people that never had a chance just to check the box and 'keep it legal'. What's the evidence to the contrary?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwo+1bVP3PQf

Is he at least going to come out as bi or something? That checks exactly zero DEI boxes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xac+1bVP3PQf

Dis-
gus-
ting

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pyv+1bVP3PQf

You're not thinking about this right, OP. You should see if J.D. has anymore single daughters and try to get a date with one of them, then marry her and suck up to daddy-in-law. It seems to be the secret sauce to a quick climb up the ladder.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mad+1bVP3PQf

Teamworks shows him under Mary Mack as a "Professional Assignment".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hvd+1bVP3PQf

It was crony capitalism under previous ceos, too. Nothing ever changes. We need Trump to come in and drain the swamp. It's a swamp.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qcj+1bVP3PQf

He’s probably about 30 years old? Minimal business experience. Now 2 down from the CEO? Right. I’m sure there was a very long and complicated hiring process to ensure that they selected the right candidate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wfy+1bVP3PQf

LOL

The gravy train rolls on.

I feel sorry for the people who will report to him, all of them probably have well more experience. I wonder MM thinks of her new finance business parter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vxk+1bVP3PQf

@ejw - You’re right, there was a formal hiring process. He was ‘formally’ selected for the job based on who he is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @njv+1bVP3PQf

So much for DEI going on across the company - Surprised Kleber Santos had nothing to say about this… suspect at best

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pdb+1bVP3PQf

You win post of the week. Call it Dude. Good work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rvv+1bVP3PQf

Sounds like White Privilege to me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pka+1bVP3PQf

Damn. Just when I hoped there would be good news.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wid+1bVP3PQf

You're probably right, but how do we know there wasn't a formal hiring process?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ejw+1bVP3PQf

Post a reply

: