Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Cheating employees whenever they can, this time illegally clawing back employee compensation

Don't let this happen to you - If the bank is clawing back your pay, seek legal advice.

https://www.housingwire.com/articles/wells-fargo-pays-96m-to-settle-lo-comp-lawsuit/

Wells Fargo agreed to pay $95.7 million to more than 5,300 home mortgage consultants to resolve a pair of class-action legal claims that allege wage-and-hour violations in California, according to the settlement agreement in federal court.

The deal will provide $62.8 million to the class members, with the remainder going to plaintiffs attorneys.

The lawsuit, which combined two legal actions that were designated a class action, was filed on behalf of 5,377 loan officers and other mortgage staffers employed by the bank in California from 2013 and 2019. James Kang, the lead plaintiff, said Wells Fargo illegally clawed back compensation.

Kang, an LO who worked at Wells Fargo between 2000 and 2015, alleged that the bank paid advances on commissions at a rate of $12 per hour but then clawed it back. He also claimed Wells Fargo didn’t compensate mortgage professionals for non-sales work, clawed back vacation pay from commissions and did not pay overtime wages as required by laws.

Wells Fargo “failed to pay plaintiff and class members for all hours worked, including but not limited to, mandatory meetings, loan processing, training and coaching sessions, loan tracking, customer surveys, attending open houses, attending events and galas, and working on certain nights or weekends,” Kang’s complaint, filed in 2017, said.

by
| 1191 views | | 3 replies (last April 2, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1aaJOvpF

3 replies (most recent on top)

bunch of uneducated criminals working here; good the banking system will be changed to get rid of all the criminals and crimes they commit

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tpy+1aaJOvpF

yes, this comp structure is not in place anymore for numerous reasons.

The suit was in california - the laws there are much stricter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fgl+1aaJOvpF

Just so you know, this was common industry practice. The claw back was a draw I bet and they might might not have been covering. All those practices have been adjusted since then. So don't think this still goes on today as this dates years ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @btd+1aaJOvpF

Post a reply

: