Time to bounce
10 replies (most recent on top)
Are more cuts coming with EMRE reorg? Was a management layer cut?
Yes, EMRE reorg is overdued. Too many management layers to shuffle ridiculous work processes.. Cut out the unproductive WORTHLESS Section Heads, Chiefs, and all that acronym layers such as DTL, GTS ...
@3yvm - yep, you're right. My only experience is with Paulsboro and Clinton, but the assumption certainly seems to be that everyone in EMRE is a technical expert - including the managers. That's probably why they think they can reduce headcount starting with "individual contributors" and work upwards, because clearly a manager can do the job of their underlings .... probably even better ! After all, for years, they've been feeding the message up the line that the only reason the company gets anything out of EMRE is because the managers are so damned good - especially Dr Syrup, the biggest con artist of them all (I'm right there with you, @fed !)
Finally, someone said something that makes a lot of sense. Thanks!
This is such a stupid organization. So much overhead spent on DHs, Group leads and Chiefs (managers posing as senior technical people). the board should take an axe to EMRE
No material impact to business. Bottom line is you need to motivate people build trust and partnership. Then engineers will own the company like their family. No trust in many organizations doom to fail.
Reduce ,purge management in Annandale, Syrup must go, the sham is over.
Exxonmobil Research and Engineering Engineering reorg. What d-mb a-s manager came up with this without realizing what EMRE stood for...
All this work and effort to "move" a VP title. We didn't actually get rid of a layer of management, just moved him to another role.
EMRE not Emre
yep, f this place.