Thread regarding Walmart layoffs

Walmart should have done more planning

It isn’t worth being a coach unless you get stocking or front end. I am Food / fresh and consumables. It’s a ridiculous work load and no one wants to help with the massive amount of mods / price changes etc. I have two food associates and they are ran to death and my team leads are running all areas wherever needed. If stocking teams don’t finish work which is more often than not ... we are expected to finish and do everything else. Opd is definitely growing and I clash with the Asm there because she complains about everything. I stay to try and get section work, price changes etc done. I am working 14 hour days and have blisters on my feet to prove it. At the end of the day it isn’t either of our fault. Walmart should have done more planning when it came to this structure vs using millions of people like Guinea pigs. I am extremely disappointed with the company’s decisions at this point. After almost 15 years I am looking elsewhere for employment.
_ _

I totally agree, especially the part I bolded, @pqqd+198CE4xR. Everything about the digital team is an experiment.

by
| 1471 views | | 3 replies (last February 28, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+19zVuHpp

3 replies (most recent on top)

You talk about the stocking coach as if were easier than your position . I will tell you it is not . It is the same as yours. We have so much responsibilities, expectations and goals to meet as well and we are hold accountable if we don’t meet those goals . You will see many quitting before they get fired . We do our jobs and when you see freight left from us is either in a 2 trucks days or to many call outs or COVID Leave. But the pressure and accountability is still there

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4kic+19zVuHpp

Sorry but I have to BEEWHA HAHAHAHHAHAHAH DUMB A$$ you fail for this c-ap of a job ? Walmart could care less - you deserve what you get for not researching these id–ts that run this Ahole of a company !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ppv+19zVuHpp

New structures; 1 person = 3.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zvj+19zVuHpp

Post a reply

: