I worked at WF 2 decades ago I left after my boss and HR harassed me for doing work, while my boss and workers were not and were involved in s-xual harassment and embezzlement.
I quit without notice after taking the bank global with operations in London. After l left everything fell apart and they got couldn't meet a consent order from the OCC.
Should I feel guilty or was I suppose to do all the work while s-xing and stealing? Wouldn't the corporation go under if all employees did that?
wait, is this someone that works here now? Look familiar in some emails that get sent out
And in the last 4 years I Pucci is everything now global without notice again ain’t goin’ in no more.
Wrong I have a college degree and at the time 15 years of experience.
It’s possible that there is an actual grievance here, but the post is somewhat incoherent as well as being grammatically incoherent. The problem that I have with it is that no senior or potentially senior leader who could successfully take Wells global in any or all lines of business could have such poor communications skills in their native language, and that such a person would also have resolved this privately, worked out disagreements, credit, recognition plans and promotion going forward. Also they would never leave early without notice, sabotaging their own work and allowing it to collapse.
I do believe that she was involved, likely worked her tail off, and likely worked for aloof and incompetent senior managers but did not have the degrees and/or work background to properly present her issues. Sometimes talented people become highly visible too early and cannot cover the whole spectrum of requirements. I’ve been there. I hope she gets back on the horse and hits it out of the park.
She has both the ring of truth and a sad tail of not being ready for the opportunity. In a fair world her managers would have jumped in with guidance.
You are right...your post is not believable.
I’m pretty sure the only one who cares about or understands what you are trying to say is yourself.
Last comment and we're done.
WF became global in 2007 before the Wachovia merger in late 2018 because all their customers we in the US and they may have provided services such as money transfer and currency exchange services to their US customers. But it wasn't until in 2017 that it tasted becoming a global bank and after Wachovia inherited more customers outside of US. I put on my resume that I took WF global and it's true. Anyone wants to fight me for that recognition?
The bank never had global operations before 2007. WF only focused on community banking and lent monies and issued credit cards in US only. Only in late 2008 did the merger with Wachovia WF happen and they became global. I know because me Pucci came back in 2009 to help in merging WF with Wachovia. I then came back in 2015 and all their risk management data was corrupted because after the merger the execution was poor and they were simply signing off on risk assessments and had no experience. I quit this last time again without notice the last and final time and took all my expertise with me. And in the last 4 years is everything now.
By the way beyond raking the bank global I was responsible for getting them to be PCI compliant and even more but I ain't going in anymore so to keep my anonymity. This Beeotch that is me us a legend. Any questions?
Reality is stranger than fiction.
Pucci
The bank had global operations much earlier than two decades ago. But thanks for playing.
For some reason, I just don't believe this post.
Never happened
After two decades one would think you could move on.
I you could write correct English, I might be able to understand what you are saying. smh
It makes sense