Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

On the CEO

  • Our CEO is nearly in hiding. And when he does appear, he is evasive on all important topics. As someone else said, sometimes what you don’t say is more important than what you do say.
  • I have never seen a CEO who couldn’t care less about the engagement/morale of his employees. Employee morale is proven to have a direct link to productivity. He can’t even fake it. I don’t think he’s a complete id–t so that either means he knows he’s a short-timer or the company is a short-timer.
by
| 3401 views | | 15 replies (last December 17, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18pC21py

15 replies (most recent on top)

@2xco+18pC21p Charlie actually is the victim here. Sellers did not disclose incomplete projects and outstanding and actually represented that there were no agreements that would be binding on…or adversely affect Scharf, the purchaser.

I hope that we all can agree that he was victimized and deserves redress through the courts. It’s not whining to sue over a several million dollar swindle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3amh+18pC21py

He doesn't care about the company or the "employees" at all! He is here for the payout he will receive after he cuts thousands of employees and improves the efficiency ratio he keeps yapping about. I actually wish he would be in hiding more - the sight of the crooked, condescending smile on his face on Teamworks every day is disturbing!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2njj+18pC21py

And today there is a post on TW about Charlie visiting employees in Charlotte :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yvr+18pC21py

Is anyone actually thinking that someone this naive and whiny is capable of turning WF around?
https://nypost.com/2018/09/10/bank-of-new-york-mellon-ceo-sues-over-18-5m-penthouse-deal/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xco+18pC21py

CEO actually does care about the engagement/morale of the employees. The lower that they can drive employee morale, the more likely that many will leave on their own without associated severance costs. It’s important to save that money cause it’s expensive to cut headcount.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pdu+18pC21py

This place is toxic beyond belief. I felt it at a low level, i can only imagine what a high ranking person feels. I would be in hiding too. They do anything to make people not only quit but to destroy them and their health which we all know what this leads to. Of course he had to bring in new people, no way the ones here would do anything to help. This is no joke.

I recommend he replaces everyone here and get people who has the right skills to do the work and layoff the 80k.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bir+18pC21py

He’s not in hiding when he’s out maskless with the many pretty people in the city, and I swear, some of them are girls.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1umh+18pC21py

Employee morale is a concern of companies that are looking to attract top talent, keep them happy, and grow the business.

Does that sound like Wells Fargo?

Of course not. Wells Fargo is on the opposite track. They’re all about cutting non-core businesses, closing locations, and reducing headcount.

Morale is not a factor. Just doesn’t matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jiw+18pC21py

Seems he is just breaking it off and selling pieces at at time

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zzz+18pC21py

Scharf cannot sell Wells Fargo to Goldman or JPM

GS does not have remotely enough money to buy WF. WF has a balance sheet that’s double the size of Goldman’s

JPM cannot buy WF, there is a cap on total deposits and the the regulators would NEVER allow this much consolidation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1irl+18pC21py

I don't agree with your third point re: selling the company to GS or JPM. You do have to wonder why Wells doesn't take a hint from other companies and move it's headquarters out of SF. This would be a quick win for Charlie and the company through tax, real estate and salary savings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yny+18pC21py

Breaking news: there's this thing called COVID-19...

Lots of people across the nation have been "in hiding" since April or so. It's not limited to executives or WF employees. Executives and managers can conduct a lot of their work by phone/txt/email/Skype/teams, so that's what they've been doing. Rest assured there will be plenty of CEO townhalls and rah rah meetings in your future.

As far as the task before the CEO goes, sure, reducing costs and resolving our regulatory issues / asset cap is job 1 and 2, and it should be. That task may or may not be effectively executed, time will tell, but it's clearly a reasonable approach for a bank in our position. I mean, what are we supposed to do, waste money and not worry about the asset cap? Makes no sense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dju+18pC21py

Shareholders come before employees... Sad but true...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ilr+18pC21py

I think many would agree with both those points. He is a short timer hired to make the stock price look good, that’s why he doesn’t worry about dealing with the fallout...and believe me with the terrible decisions on who to layoff there will be.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zlq+18pC21py

Chainsaw Charlie has a few goals.

  1. Reduce the ridiculous efficiency ratio of the company - This is done by massive layoffs
  2. Sell as many business units as possible - This is currently in process
  3. Once 1 and 2 are done, sell the entire company to Goldman or JPM.

Why would he care how we feel as employees. It does not benefit him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sjo+18pC21py

Post a reply

: