Were stuck with Lawler for the foreseeable future. I knew the fix was in weeks ago. Surprise, surprise– the Judge, who used to be an investment banker and has zero understanding of oil and gas exploration, thinks the BOD and Lawler did a splendid job.
Yo Judge! Check the batteries in that HP 12c you were talking about. Better yet—get a HP 10b II—it’s simpler and your skills are weak.
The Judge was an apologist for the fraud from day one. Yesterday, the Judge said that just the thought of being on the Chesapeake Board during the past 3 years was frightening to the Judge. The Judge thinks that the Board and Lawler are some kind of modern day Achilles equivalents—he may as well have started his comments with “Oh brave Ulysses.”
It’s clear to me that this judge has never done a day of real work in his life.
It was bad, bad, bad. What a farce this whole bankruptcy has been.
But the Judge is not the only problem. The UCC couldn’t/wouldn’t produce any real alternatives to the proposed plan, couldn’t produce a witness who would state CHK should be liquidated.
I’ll finish with an example of the folly. Yesterday, the lady lawyer for Kirkland, arguing in support of the plan, dismissed criticism of the Wildhorse acquisition, which was insolvent at the time of the acquisition, by saying the CHK EBIDA numbers improved for quarters following the acquisition. While not citing a single number, she claimed the evidence was uncontroverted.
EBIDA—earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization. Those numbers are meaningless in the exploration game because capital costs are so high. The bad part is that that claim may have been uncontroverted as the UCC lawyers fizzled out quite quickly. Like Lawler and the CHK BOD, the UCC lawyers were quite weak.
If you have lawyers for the UCC who can’t make a case and a judge who doesn’t understand exploration, the chances for an equitable resolution are slim and none. Yesterday Slim was out of town!