Thread regarding Oracle Corp. layoffs

90% of oracle's earnings per share growth is due to stock buybacks

At the software giant, buybacks have spurred a lot of borrowing and spending. Executive chairman and co-founder Larry Ellison’s company has spent roughly $75 billion to buy back stock since its 2016 fiscal year, and $41 billion over the last five quarters, which far outpaces the company’s $19 billion in free cash flow. The multiyear buyback binge cost more than a third of today’s market value for Oracle and has pushed the company into net debt despite sporting $35.7 billion in cash and short-term investments on its balance sheet.
“It’s staggering how much money they’ve spent buying back shares,″ said CFRA Research analyst John Freeman, who downgraded the stock to a sell rating on Wednesday. “I’d say 90% of their earnings-per-share growth the last two years has come from buying back shares. He [Ellison] must believe the software-as-a-service companies he would otherwise want to buy are overvalued.″⁣
Oracle spokeswoman Deborah Hellinger declined to comment.
Even though it is still among the 10 U.S. companies with the most cash, according to FactSet Research, its net cash (cash minus short- and long-term debt) is negative $17 billion. That’s about a $32 billion decline since 2016, as the software giant took out a lot of cheap debt to fund buybacks.
For all that, the stock is up just 35% in the last five years, less than half the gain of the Nasdaq Composite, a common tracker for technology stocks, and a third of the gain of the S&P 500 Information Technology sector.

From: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/05/oracle-shows-buybacks-can-go-too-far.html

by
| 2031 views | | 5 replies (last January 2, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+12L1BwnT

5 replies (most recent on top)

Holy Sh– !!! 41B in 5 qrts ?!?! I knew we were aggresively doing buybacks, but never imagined at this level.
This is completely unsustainable, and it's insane for a technology company to make debts to buyback stocks.... I would understand make debts to start a new project, but not for this purely financial operation...
well... time to leave...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fju+12L1BwnT

After being laid off by Oracle it was tough to find a new job in the same role. True, for personal reasons I stayed with Oracle for 10 years after being acquired, I had kept my resume up to date, but it wasn't until I interviewed for jobs with companies in San Francisco that I truly realized how dated my skills were.

I had been part of a centralized organization, which meant everything had to be done the same and to the lowest common denominator, which was pretty low. Therefore it was difficult to work on new technologies with cutting-edge tools. Favoritism meant the same trusted people kept getting the plum assignments. What you had accomplished before Oracle meant nothing.

I ended up taking a job doing something completely different from my role at Oracle. What a relief, honestly, to leave all that @%$! behind and start anew. I'm so much happier now, working at a company with a quarterly bonus plan, fully paid benefits, where the CEO actually communicates and your co-workers respond to your emails!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @chz+12L1BwnT

"Nothing but cutbacks for a decade will put a dent in your bottom line. It takes innovation to stay on par. No innovation for 10 years is a problem... especially in Technology. "

Nonsense. We waste time in zoom, slack off in slack and busy converting whatever twikis that are still working to confluence. We are paying lip service to the bleeding edge of tech and have unmarketable skills that make us all unemployable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fdw+12L1BwnT

Nothing but cutbacks for a decade will put a dent in your bottom line. It takes innovation to stay on par. No innovation for 10 years is a problem... especially in Technology.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sxf+12L1BwnT

circling the drain

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pvx+12L1BwnT

Post a reply

: