As someone who worked for KKR executives on behalf of First Data in Omaha, I can share some insight into what the equity managers are thinking when they look at Union Pacific. These individuals are setting the tone because they control the majority of asset management; they're your hedge funds, private equity, portfolio managers, bond funds, global bankers, etc. They determine what Union Pacific's strategic set will be because senior leadership must please and delight them in order to 1) increase their personal wealth accumulation, 2) sustain their leadership positions, and 3) avoid unpleasant external events like corporate raiders, hostile boards, shareholder litigation, etc.
Equity managers see the rail sector as a tremendous gem in the rough. They'll joke about finding a supermodel underneath 200 extra pounds of fat: get her in the gym, on a treadmill, and cut off all the donuts and cake, and she'll be a beautiful girl when you're done with her.
Rail is particularly interesting given how much fat is on the girl, per the metaphor. Many of the opportunities for radical transformation and extraction of the surplus (via freeing up money wasted on older, ineffective ways) are ready. Some priority opportunities:
-
Destroy old "family/longevity" employment practices: Rail companies have antiquated labor practices where it's still possible to enter at the bottom, work up, and spend a life there. This must be gutted. Millions being wasted doing much in-house; hotel hospitality knows the value of using contractors to clean rooms (esp. when cleaning firms can skirt immigration laws). Why can't UP benefit from contracting out core operations facilities in the field? Uberify the low-skill contractor work (e.g. safety audits can be performed by $9/hour employees of another firm with a tablet and an app). Offshore operations and IT completely. Outsource marketing and finance - nobody needs to manage HR and payroll in-house either. There's Operations-as-a-Service firms with nifty apps for that. Bonus to destroying old family notions is that you put the remaining base of employees in a perpetual state of precarity, ensuring their fear will keep them working 60-80 hours/week, never asking for modest raises. Unions are destroyed.
-
Automation: Regardless of what workers think, the equity managers see Tesla and automated driving as a stable technology. Trains don't need people running them. "It's even safer that way - nobody gets killed (on the train) if there's a crash!" If some kids or drivers are in the way of the train, railroads are already positioned to shift the bulk of that liability. Think about it: if there's not even an engineer to fail at noticing the stalled car on the crossing, there's no human to sue. Further pressure on lobbyists can help shift liability even further off of the railroad.
Equity managers likely see a firm that can lose 60% or more of its headcount within 5 years and get down to less than a quarter the headcount size in 10. The remaining headcount will be union free and cost controlled, save for an appropriate management team with whatever compensation is necessary to move it to this size. Sell the Omaha headquarters building, integrate it into the equity community in New York, and let operations management function in cheaper digs. Aggressive automation allows operations to be more location independent, allowing bidding wars between communities for tax credits (look at ConAgra as an example here).
The payoff? A stock well over $400/share. It's not greed, as referenced above. It's how financial markets function today. It's where the money's at and if you're in the equity class, this is what you do to earn your living (and sustain a nice life). GM's no different nor are any other manufacturing, transporatation and industrial U.S. firms.
One final note: this isn't an issue of Democrats vs Republicans. Both parties work for the equity manager class. They don't work for you all. In fact, they laugh about the fools in the middle class that think one or other parties care about you per whatever campaign message they're peddling. They know who they work for. It doesn't matter who's in the White House because they work for the equity owners. Nothing you do is going to change that. You're not going to get your Bernie/Socialism pipe dream nor your MAGA nonsense. In spite of whatever lies the middle class tells itself, Trump is of the equity manager class; he's a rather inept member and laughed at by most as an incompetent joke, which only ensures Trump wants to prove them wrong by pleasing them. There's nothing wrong about Trump or Hillary other than they're just not who any of the middle class pretend them to be.
It's a different world for American workers. The middle class dream peaked in the late 70s; remember that Reagan was the first MAGA president, elected in a massive surge when Carter failed to stand up to the massive new war led by high finance. Americans had their half-century of privilege and now the equity class is working on cashing that all in for themselves. Do the best you can to stay educated and be prepared to accept far less. The lower class already knows what you're going to get to accept: $30K-$40K/year max. 401K only if you contribute into it (with at most 2% match ala the KKR model, though that'll be into the company stock which may be an issue if you work for the half of their properties that go bankrupt ala ToysRUs, Sears, etc.). Europeans are already getting comfortable with this new normal and you will to.
Don't mean to be a pessimist here but to let you know the practical reality that's been engineered for you by the equity class. Don't bother shouting about political parties or economic systems. It's been decided by those who get to make those decisions. The most you can do is determine what path you can take within what is offered.