Thread regarding Citrix Systems Inc. layoffs

Goodbye Santa Clara

Anyone heard rumors about moving out of the more expensive Cali site? Mark T. wanted a presence there and it seems current leadership does not.

by
| 2732 views | | 11 replies (last December 2, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Q5stJA3

11 replies (most recent on top)

Layoff Permanent 12/04/2017 Citrix Systems, Inc. Santa Clara 97 Closure Permanent

Previously cited here Death blow coming to Santa Clar site, see the citrix entry for 12/4/2017 reported to the state of California here http://www.edd.ca.gov/jobs_and_training/warn/WARN_Report_for_7-1-2017_to_11-25-2017.pdf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sego+Q5stJA3

Death blow coming to Santa Clar site, see the citrix entry for 12/4/2017 reported to the state of California here http://www.edd.ca.gov/jobs_and_training/warn/WARN_Report_for_7-1-2017_to_11-25-2017.pdf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ovsq+Q5stJA3

Double LIKES to @2njb, Citrix is Elliott Managements ugly skank that did not turn out to be the lottery for them like Dell and EMC. They are desperately trying to dress this pig-in-a-poke to sell her off to the first possible gullible suitor that falls for it. Too bad, Citrix had so much promise but GREED got in the way...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mib+Q5stJA3

"Citrix management" ????, it's now "Finance Management"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2prj+Q5stJA3

Citrix management is in the hands of Elliott. No M&A, no innovation, no R&D. Just building closings, layoffs and stock buy backs. Anything to try and bump the stock price so that Elliott can cash out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2njb+Q5stJA3

ya, Citrix is a laughing stock of tech companies in silicon valley, nobody would wants to work at Citrix unless they are in between jobs or just need employment to pay bills. Inevitably new employees move on to other companies after 366 days and vesting of any first year RSUs.

That is what you get when you have no technical leadership , market growth or innovative ideas to capture the market.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pwl+Q5stJA3

Downward plan started 2 years back, 4 buildings (including 4555 address) to 3 to 2 to 1 to next step 0.

Finally numbers . . . . . .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1amx+Q5stJA3

Citrix has building 3. New and never occupied. A testament to unfulfilled plans.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1icf+Q5stJA3

They could keep building 2 for the EBC and move everyone from building 1 into 2. They moved all the labs out of Building 1 to co-los a while back so they dont need much space in Building 1. They will still have three floors empty after consolidation into Building 2 and can always layoff more people to suit the consolidation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lqd+Q5stJA3

I've only heard about them consolidating down to one building, not about leaving the area. They would have to divest NetScaler if they want to leave Santa Clara. They will have two empty buildings in Santa Clara in an area with an over supply of office space. This shows that Citrix is off course. It is the impact of Elliott and the failure to develop new products that is causing the layoffs and the resulting empty buildings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qro+Q5stJA3

Won't be surprised, Any thing could happen in Citrix !!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xyk+Q5stJA3

Post a reply

: