Thread regarding ConocoPhillips layoffs

Lwr 48 Shale: Are we making any money or are we chasing barrels to shore up production volumes?

"The worlds largest independent" is running a total of 12 rigs in the Lwr 48. With current oil prices, can this high-cost, process-burdened, slow-moving, poorly-managed enterprise make money in shale in this price environment? Don't think so. This company never talks about the commercial value of the EF, Bakken or Permian-Delaware. Conversations and presentations are limited to early production volumes. The commercial value is exposed in the poor Lwr 48 commercial performance every month,every quarter, every year.

Can't understand why there is a need for all the people & processes for a 12 rig program yielding non-commercial results.

In addition to Surmont, the Lwr 48 shale holdings should be sold or farmed-out.

by
| 1822 views | | 4 replies (last May 3, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+N5EzwrE

4 replies (most recent on top)

@N5EzwrE-1ypy "Where will all the people go" ...... They will go out the door with their personal items......Soon ConocoPhillips will disappear!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jup+N5EzwrE

Somewhere else, present company included.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ypy+N5EzwrE

12 rigs? We ran 3 rigs in the Lwr 48 during 2016. "Stepped it up" to 8 during 1st quarter 2017 (had "great" 1st qtr earnings report today). Just increased the count to 12 in April 2017 (this may destroy 2017 Lwr 48 financial performance). Wells being drilled in current oil price environment are marginal at best.....really need those BOEPD for the analysts....sold some assets (San Juan and Canada)....still have more assets to sell ( Panhandle-Anadarko-Barnett, Permian marginal, GOM onshore marginal, more Canada: Surmont). Reserves & production to take a huge hit. Where will all the people go?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pgn+N5EzwrE

Canada assets made more money than lwr48 in Q1- what's with that?

Surmont ster better than Eaglet Ford

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rco+N5EzwrE

Post a reply

: