Hi @Jo9y2MS-yyq
OK, now lets review. Saudi Arabia and OPEC has controlled oil prices as long as I have been alive.
True and I agree, your first point is true. This became apparent in the 70’s, and since that crisis the USA policy dictated that crude could not be exported and secondly that the USA will strive to become self sufficient in oil. With shale the USA can now export and be self sufficient in crude. This is also why so many developed countries do not want to rely upon oil. They wish to be interdependent of the oil producers, most producers are unstable and questionable regimes, this in its self is a motivation for energy independence.
I agree with your second point the world has been paying too much and OPEC has held the world to ransom for 40 years.
Your third point, that the Saudi’s supported terrorism in order to protect their own interests - well that is not uncommon for a government to support those that are less than desirable for their own ends. Or come to that even companies do so - does anyone remember Southern Egypt - whoops Sudan a corrupt despicable regime that SLB was more than happy to do business with. Many believe that Iraq was only invaded because of oil. The Saudi’s are not alone in that.
But your final point about the honesty and trust one can place in SLB is reckless. Very reckless indeed as the Justice Department discovered.
Oil services giant Schlumberger Ltd. was fined $232.7 million by the Justice Department Wednesday for violating sanctions on Iran and Sudan.
Fully owned subsidy Schlumberger Oilfield Holdings Ltd. admitted guilt to one count of "knowingly and willfully conspiring to violate" the US International Emergency Economic Powers Act, under which US sanctions are applied, the department said.
According to the charges, the company's Texas-based drilling and measurements unit provided services to Iran and Sudan between 2004 and 2010 and tried to hide the fact from authorities.
Or why have a survey it is obvious that SLB has many unhappy employees, a recent thread concerning Southampton accused the management of “Schlumberger management are experts at telling huge lies in fact they are exceptionally shameless about it.”
So at any level one can only conclude that SLB is only a money making machine and to trust it is reckless.
However the point of the thread was really to point out that in my opinion { and it is only an opinion } that the days of oil are numbered.
The USA and China have ratified the Paris Agreement concerning climate change, the UK is building a new nuclear plant because the UK is concerned how it will meet emission targets, why are these governments doing this? - because the world as a wish and desire to change and a need to change. That is why I believe oil will remain low, technology in renewables, nuclear and shale production will keep the price down.
Plus OPEC and the main producers {except the USA} are not able to come to some agreement concerning production caps.
However I thank you for your response a considered response that I do not totally agree with but debate is shallow if we all agree.
As for @Jo9y2MS-xly naturally I do know about the petrochemical industry and all of the products that originate from the industry.
Hi @Jo9y2MS-vmk
“self congratulating monkey, your mumbling is older than the oil itself” Your right about that one - monkeys do have quite a brain I take it your ancestors have not even managed to cruel out of the mud yet - yep I can do the insults as well.