Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Lawsuit

Qualcomm has been doing this as well. Basically an employee is claiming YAHOO artificially gave bad performance ratings to many people and used it as the reason to lay them off to avoid the WARN act. Does this sound familiar?

http://nypost.com/2016/02/01/fired-yahoo-employee-taking-marissa-mayer-to-court/?ref=yfp

by
| 1383 views | | 8 replies (last February 4, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+FKpiPNT

8 replies (most recent on top)

There is a shareholder's meeting on March 8, at 9:30 in Irwin Jacobs Hall. If you own stock, or a vested interest in stock, be there. When the shareholders hear what is going on, they may be less inclined to vote for that compensation package for the executives....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cqw+FKpiPNT

This Q corruption in giving phony PIPs must stop at some point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1atw+FKpiPNT

Q deserves a lawsuit,100times. can's wait to see it immersed in many other lawsuits.

No work ethics to managers and above, giving low ratings , pony pips, and if you are on h1b and they no package also

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pkg+FKpiPNT

@FKpiPNT-jsz, right on. They do not want you to think further and realize that you can filed for more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qiv+FKpiPNT

@gxu: No, I didn't sign up for it. The contract says that employment is at-will, and that Qualcomm has the right to terminate my employment at any time with or without cause. There's a world of difference between having the right to fire someone and reserving the right to insert a false evaluation into an employee's file. For performance reviews to be non-discriminatory they must, at the very least, use objectively resonable standards to measure criteria relative to the job.Have any of you ever asked to see the standards used? It's an eye-opener. Let's just say that they are so vague that a manager or director could exercise unlimited discretion in giving an employee any number. Add to this the fact that the final numbers are often assigned by persons higher up the management "food chain" who are unfamiliar with your work, who may not even know who you are, and may not even be based on your job performance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nkw+FKpiPNT

@FKpiPNT-gxu. No one signed up for "this". "This", if true, is illegal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ajc+FKpiPNT

Once you are setup to go via phony fabricated PIPs, they ask you sign the GTFO package exactly to prevent these.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jsz+FKpiPNT

you signed up for this when you agreed to work at Qualcomm. Get over it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gxu+FKpiPNT

Post a reply

: