https://www.businessinsider.com/boeing-737-max-american-airlines-staff-beg-avoid-plane-2019-11
15 replies (most recent on top)
Boeing declared the winner at Dubai Air show
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4308117-dubai-airshow-day-4-boeing-winner-day
Airbus declared the winner at Dubai Air show
https://www.thenational.ae/business/aviation/dubai-airshow-closes-with-54-5bn-in-deals-as-airbus-leads-boeing-1.940850
You decide
I tend to read international news with a grain of salt, but I do read.
Kazakhstan is a non English country so placing emphasis on their
use of English is relevant how?
The ban could be from our state department exploitation of technology
The ban could be from their side banning exploding aircraft
Sometimes things get lost in translation.
If you had read the article the last paragraph stated.
{This type of jets are temporarily banned in many countries
of the world, including in Kazakhstan, after air crashes.}
Again the sentence structure is poor, but the message is clear
Keep your Max
"ban on exploitation"???
ex·ploi·ta·tion
/ˌekˌsploiˈtāSH(ə)n/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work.
"the exploitation of migrant workers"
the action of making use of and benefiting from resources.
"the Bronze Age saw exploitation of gold deposits"
I tend to discount "news" organizations who can't use the proper word (not once, but twice in the article)
The Air Astana has earlier announced about its plan to purchase
30 Boeing 737 MAX planes for $3.6 billion. -
Decision on purchase of Boeing 737 MAX jets not yet taken
Minister of Industry. -
The Air Astana national airline cannot buy Boeing 737 MAX aircraft
as long as the ban on exploitation of this jet is not lifted.
https://akipress.com/news:629136:Decision_on_purchase_of_Boeing_737_MAX_jets_not_yet_taken__-_Minister_of_Industry/
Beware The Social Engineers: (Machiavelli guide for ruling)
AKA - H.R. / Corporate management / Union management
The Boeing family is a tight principled team.
This does not mean that as a family we want to keep evil siblings or practices.
Boeing was the greatest company of all time, at one time.
Now we have the cover-ups and those who want to spin the Max debacle as an
Engineering mistake that led to the two “accidents” (these were no accidents).
The Boeing family wants to cast out the Jeffery Dormers of this origination.
The Spin Doctors who would cover-up or keep us quite via intimidation.
Stop the termination and persecution of whistle-blowers as in the 1989 case.
This time was different; this is the third instance in BCA history of criminality
Where lives were lost solely based on “Greed” rather than a mistake.
This time many engineers set aside copies, transcripts and notes ready to go
Knowing these “accidents” were unavoidable and they went public quickly.
Adding to the Max debacle were two aircraft lost quickly, as predicted.
As we peruse through this site and all the many post, some silly, some not.
See if you can pick-out Corporate management / Union management / H.R.
It’s not hard to do, their attempts to quell others through shame or intimidation
are the hallmark of the new Boeing management culture that created this mess.
Find Waldo
FAA Pushes Back in a November 14 2019 Memorandum:
https://theaircurrent.com/aviation-safety/faa-pushes-back-on-pressure-to-return-boeing-737-max-to-service/
Vaya Con Dios
I Like That
(IMO) "Vaya Con Dios" should be printed on every ticket sold for the Max
and or For every ticket sold for an NG 11 years old or over
Make It So
Hey I see this topic is so hot that …
The Donald got evolved
LMAO
Once the Max has been in service for a year, I would fly on that thing.
I will not fly - Alaskan Airways
I will fly - South West
I will not fly - Air Canada
To me; it does matter who’s operating the ship.
I would Not Fly United Airlines - Ever, you know the friendly thugs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2S9T505hVY
There’s only 600 billion dollars at stake.
Who would lie to protect such a paltry Doetrust Boeing; they have never given me a reason not to trust them.
I trust our government; they would never lie to anyone.
I’m sure the Max will be fine when it’s back on the line.
It’s not as if a wing is going to break off or something like on an NG
Vaya Con Dios
@dfd
You ain't kidding, the link
https://www.businessinsider.com/boeing-737-max-american-airlines-staff-beg-avoid-plane-2019-11
Then pushes you to "according to The Dallas Morning News". To read the story.
But they want you to subscribe to their rag for 99 cents a month.
Why when I can read the same story while waiting in line at the grocery
Dirty Laundry at a price
The fact remains...you claim to be more educated than "the unwashed masses" and you probably are.
That makes it doubly troubling that with all you know and the lack of confidence you have, and all the " documentation" (your words, not mine) you would still work for the company and take their money.
If it was the "unwashed masses" (again, your words, not mine) that worked at Boeing and took a paycheck, then there is an excuse. But not for a well educated person such as yourself. Again, the word is GREED. If you really know the story (and I ha e no doubt you do) why not show some gumption and find another more reputable company to work for instead of the hypocrisy you are showing now.
"I am puzzled"
You must mean perplexed, It's the Max
I would suggest reading in an effort to become informed
@11MPoEcs-3rnq
They are hordes of unwashed masses that would gladly board that plane.
Managements attempts to bolster its reputation @11UCe1J3-1gbq
Fails in the face of documentation
Lunch times over back to work
So, I guess I am puzzled.
You have no confidence in the product your company produces
You have no confidence in the management of the company you work for.
You have no faith in the oversight body for the product your company produces
Why do you work there?
Are there no other employers where you live.
Because if there are other employers and you help to produce a product you don't believe in and don't believe anyone should fly on, you are just there for the money. They have a name for that: GREED
Corporate News Organizations are in the business of ratings, Not News.
Their focus is on sensationalism, not facts. All of them do it.
It’s about selling Advertising using click bate.
In some cases lies with obfuscation Reference: MSNBC using the If True Preface
Reference: ABC News Creating Propaganda
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/14/abc-news-busted-creating-fake-news-propaganda-surrounding-syrian-conflict/
The Use of Click Bate
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-34213693
Back to the Max Facts
Would you take the Risk with full knowledge of all that’s come out now?
And A rudimentary understanding of flight control systems, along with the
different design philosophies between Boeing and Airbus.
Do you want to fly a “Rube Goldberg Creation” A Frankenstein Boeing Airbus?
Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice, I’ve got no recourse in this case.
Who among us has faith in the FAA or in Boeing Management?
We Work for the Company, imagine what the informed public thinks.
Now Imagine what other professionals in the industry are thinking!!!
Wow - @11X7Gb0o-4sto
The Most Sobering Question Is - @11MPoEcs
The con artists that make up the board of directors fully Earned this Mess
The rest of this nation are victims too, but at least we can still talk about it.