Thread regarding Sears layoffs

Guam being sold to Kmart Australia

Just heard this out of HE. They are also interested in global Kmart brand rights. Could spell the end of Kmart USA.

by
| 6942 views | | 20 replies (last September 4, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+10PJUsZu

20 replies (most recent on top)

Then why does Wesfarmers have an Anko store in Metro Seattle, after testing pop-up versions over the past year? Why is Wesfarmers hiring warehouse workers for an Anko warehouse in Seattle?

I can draw a line between Wesfarmers and TransformCo and it means buying the global rights to the KMart name in exchange for sunsetting it in the US and instead making Anko the next retail success story.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3epa+10PJUsZu

No, this is absolutely false.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3lpy+10PJUsZu

With Wesfarmers, I definitely could see Guam succeeding for the long haul. The demerger with Coles has given them cash, and they’re willing to stick with the times and not fall into a retail spiral.

Also, Anko is going to be a major growth brand (they already have a store in Washington State).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cbh+10PJUsZu

If Wesfarmers bought the Guam store Target would arguably be a better brand. Or of course Walmart could buy it, since they're already in Hawaii, Japan and China.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yho+10PJUsZu

This is probably factual. Someone posted another thread from HE over a month ago that Kmart Australia execs had flow into Hoffman.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @szc+10PJUsZu

I hope this is true. Guam needs this store and Kmart Australia is decent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @udy+10PJUsZu

@ufk

Since you seem to be lacking reading comprehension, let's try this again:

"TheLayoff.com is a simple discussion board for all of us who would like to learn more about the rumors or possibility of job cuts in our company.

The workforce reduction process is inherently secretive and plagued with rumors. Companies release little or no details while planning such resource actions. On the other hand, the lives of each of us may be greatly impacted by these top-secret decisions - hence all the anxiety that workers may experience.

Enter TheLayoff.com - The purpose of this site is to provide a space for anyone who'd like to discuss the possibility, likelihood or impacts of layoffs in a company of interest."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ugd+10PJUsZu

@flm Nope. Facts must be verifiable. This is a retail news website. Much like CNN, FOX, NBC, whatever, articles should be sourced and verified.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ufk+10PJUsZu

@flm This is literally a rumor website. It says so in its description.

"TheLayoff.com is a simple discussion board for all of us who would like to learn more about the rumors or possibility of job cuts in our company."

It's right there on the front page. But go off with your "news" theory...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xfv+10PJUsZu

@cpv @cmt @why @bwr
NO. People must only post verifiable facts. This is a retail NEWS website, not a rumor website. Facts with proof, or it didn't happen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @flm+10PJUsZu

@mzi lacks reading comprehension

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cpv+10PJUsZu

Thanks, @why, so true. Tagging this as #thelayoff #GOLD post

I think you are missing the whole point of this site. People are welcome to post any form of information they may wish to contribute. It can be rumors, opinions, confidences, or verifiable facts. In this case the OP posted something they "heard" out of HE. You are free to accept, dismiss, or dispute this bit of information, however, the OP is under no obligation to meet any burden of proof requirement!
about 2 hours ago by Anonymous | 3 reactions (+3/-0)

Post ID: @10PJUsZu-why

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cmt+10PJUsZu

@mzi - I think you are missing the whole point of this site. People are welcome to post any form of information they may wish to contribute. It can be rumors, opinions, confidences, or verifiable facts. In this case the OP posted something they "heard" out of HE. You are free to accept, dismiss, or dispute this bit of information, however, the OP is under no obligation to meet any burden of proof requirement!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @why+10PJUsZu

I don't need to offer proof that his statement is false. I don't need to prove a negative. I could post that I'm a Millionaire Married to a supermodel, but unless I prove it, my statement means nothing. I googled Guam Kmart and have found zero evidence of this sale. Not Saying it's false, just Saying posts like this should include proof.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mzi+10PJUsZu

Kmart is already dead. And Sears. How can people still not realize this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jzp+10PJUsZu

SMH

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yoo+10PJUsZu

I think them selling the Guam store to Australia pretty much true. The other new saying that they want the global rights to Kmart I am not so sure. I heard about it though and would not be surprised. Most likely though yeah, it would pretty much k–l off Kmart the US.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yow+10PJUsZu

@ick - I don't see you offering any proof or evidence that the OP's statement is false!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bwr+10PJUsZu

Well if the Australians buy Kmart as a whole maybe there will be actual hope for the brand here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gsz+10PJUsZu

Any proof? I see no evidence online of this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ick+10PJUsZu

Post a reply

: