Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Broken Promises

Companies that frequently lay off employees betray the implicit contract of job security and loyalty. This leads to a stressful work environment, decreased morale, and a loss of trust. This causes irreparable harm the company's reputation which deters top talent and reduces productivity.

Cisco is proving this to be true. They are at the end of Q1 FY 2025. The entire quarter was a dumpster fire and they know it. Morale is low, Stress is high. Productivity is limping along. They still don't understand the full impact of the last layoff and now there is rumor of another big one coming.

But not only has Cisco broken the employee contract, they've broken the partner contract.

Partner Summit is coming up in USA whilst partners are increasingly frustrated. Splunk sells direct, competing with CIsco's very own "partners". The Cisco partner program is a steaming pile. Partners have abandoned it in favor of competitors. They get Cisco pricing mainly to show how much better a deal they are getting from HPE, Arista, Microsoft, AWS, Juniper, Palo Alto, Fortinet...

no doubt they'll have to pay a little extra to buy this year's "Best Company to Work For" plaque

by
| 1083 views | | 9 replies (last October 23, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1v8Db9C1

9 replies (most recent on top)

https://www.thelayoff.com/post/@hby+1v8Db9C1

precisely

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hug+1v8Db9C1

@ytm+1v8Db9C1 The only fire you need to worry about is the one coming from your fingers. Now get back to typing Shills guy!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vpd+1v8Db9C1
Splunk sells direct...

This is all the post is really about. I'd guess for now Cisco wants Splunk to keep returning the kind of pre-acquisition revenue and building all the support for partners still has to be justified.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jvx+1v8Db9C1

there is no "implicit" contract for "job security" and "loyalty"...Grow up co-mie.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nti+1v8Db9C1

Well put. The other tough part is that once loyal and skilled LR'd Cisco Engineers, then often go on to become change leaders who are hired by other vendors specifically to move live Cisco enterprise networks to competitors. There is a subculture of us "Old School" Joe-Era TAC folks who took our LR'd carcasses over to competitors. Really truly non-the-smartest move on Cisco's part. Kick some of the most loyal and hard-working skilled engineers out; we just take our behaviors that once helped TAC be great, and incubate the same mindset at other companies. My job is mainly migrating Cisco gear to other vendors; we also have a team that helps the migrating company sell their Cisco gear and fund the new refresh.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @myr+1v8Db9C1

As long as I make $40M and growing 30% a year, who cares about this gibberish.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pve+1v8Db9C1

@Shills guy = unemployed Dìck Wagger

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @emh+1v8Db9C1

Post ID: @hby+1v8Db9C1 - get some humanity

@ Mick - didn't the little extra raise fix everything!?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @obf+1v8Db9C1

Boo fu--ing hoo

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hby+1v8Db9C1

Post a reply

: