Thread regarding IBM layoffs

AI Is Coming for the Consultants. Inside McKinsey, ‘This Is Existential.’

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/mckinsey-consulting-firms-ai-strategy-89fbf1be

If AI can analyze information, crunch data and deliver a slick PowerPoint deck within seconds, how does the biggest name in consulting stay relevant?

By: Chip Cutter
Aug. 2, 2025 11:00 am ET

Companies pay dearly for McKinsey’s human expertise, and for nearly a century they have had good reason: The elite firm’s armies of consultants have helped generations of CEOs navigate the thorniest of challenges, synthesizing complex information and mapping out what to do next.

Now McKinsey is trying to steer through its own existential transformation. Artificial intelligence can increasingly do the work done by the firm’s highly paid consultants, often within minutes.

That reality is pushing the firm to rewire its business. AI is now a topic of conversation at every meeting of McKinsey’s board, said Bob Sternfels, the firm’s global managing partner. The technology is changing the ways McKinsey works with clients, how it hires and even what projects it takes on.

And McKinsey is rapidly deploying thousands of AI agents. Those bots now assist consultants in building PowerPoint decks, taking notes and summing up interviews and research documents for clients. The most-used bot is one that helps employees write in a classic “McKinsey tone of voice”—language the firm describes as sharp, concise and clear. Another popular agent checks the logic of a consultant’s arguments, verifying the flow of reasoning makes sense.

Sternfels said he sees a day in the not-too-distant future when McKinsey has one AI agent for every human it employs.

“We’re going to continue to hire, but we’re also going to continue to build agents,” he said.

Already, the shape of the company is shifting. The firm has reduced its head count from about 45,000 people in 2023 to 40,000 through layoffs and attrition, in part to correct for an aggressive pandemic hiring spree. It has since also rolled out roughly 12,000 AI agents.

“Do I think that this is existential for our profession? Yes, I do,” said Kate Smaje, a senior partner Sternfels tapped to lead the firm’s AI efforts earlier this year. But, “I think it’s an existential good for us.”

Consulting is emerging as an early and high-profile test case for how dramatically an industry must shift to stay relevant in the AI era. McKinsey, like its rivals, grew by hiring professionals from top universities, throwing them at projects for clients—then billing companies based, in part, on the scope and duration of the project.

AI not only speeds up projects, but it means many can be done with far fewer people, said Pat Petitti, CEO of Catalant, a freelance marketplace for consultants. Junior employees will likely be affected most immediately, since fewer of them will be needed to do rote tasks on big projects. Yet slimmer staffing is expected to ripple through the entire consulting food chain, he said.

“You have to change the business model,” Petitti said. “You have to make a dramatic change.”

Avoiding a ‘suit with PowerPoint’

One immediate change is that fewer clients want to hire consulting firms for strategy advice alone. Instead, big companies are increasingly looking for a consultant to help them put new systems in place, manage change or learn new skills, industry veterans say.

“The age of arrogance of the management consultant is over now,” said Nick Studer, CEO of consulting firm Oliver Wyman.

Companies, Studer added, “don’t want a suit with PowerPoint. They want someone who is willing to get in the trenches and help them align their team and cocreate with their team.”

At McKinsey, Sternfels is trying to cement the notion that the firm is a partner, not adviser, to clients. About a quarter of the company’s work today is in outcomes-based arrangements: McKinsey is paid partly on whether a project achieves certain results.

Advising on AI and related technology now makes up 40% of the firm’s revenue, one reason Sternfels is pushing McKinsey to evolve alongside its clients. “You don’t want somebody who is helping you to not be experimenting just as fast as you are,” he said.

The firm’s leaders are adamant that McKinsey isn’t looking to reduce the size of its workforce because of AI. Sternfels said the firm still plans to hire “aggressively” in the coming years.

But the size of teams is changing. Traditionally, a strategy project with a client might require an engagement manager—essentially, a project leader—plus 14 consultants. Today, it might need an engagement manager plus two or three consultants, alongside a few AI agents and access to “deep research” capabilities, Smaje said. Partners with decades of experience might prove more indispensable to projects, in part, because they have seen problems before.

“You can get to a pretty good, average answer using the technology now. So the kind of basic layer of mediocre expertise goes away,” Smaje said. “But the distinctive expertise becomes even more valuable.”

The fastest learners

How McKinsey changes is a topic of much interest inside the firm. In October, roughly 2,500 McKinsey partners will descend on Chicago, where the company was founded in 1926, when a University of Chicago professor named James O. McKinsey began advising businesses.

The meeting will open a year of centenary celebrations inside the firm. In between the dinners, speeches and historical reflections, AI is expected to be a topic coursing through the multiday gathering.

AI-proofing McKinsey means taking on new work, too. The firm is targeting projects once the realm of boutique firms, such as helping companies to identify and groom future executives. McKinsey has long had its own reputation as a “leadership factory,” training CEOs and bosses, and Sternfels said the firm can apply its internal expertise to others.

“That is something I don’t think will be disrupted by AI,” he said.

As McKinsey recruits, it is looking for people who can demonstrate they are fast learners. “Increasingly, you’re going to have to learn over a career at a rate you and I have never seen,” he said.

It also wants something else: People who can work well with others.

“It may sound pretty obvious, but it’s an increasingly important skill if you want to drive change in an organization,” Sternfels said.

by
| 2383 views | | 12 replies (last August 11) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k1p1w9v7

12 replies (most recent on top)

Good. Three years all those cottage industry did was serve as legal and HR cover for layoffs. An entire industry devoted to destroying people’s lives under the pretense of “data“. Let these animals fester on the rot that they brought into the world.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hx+1k1p1w9v7

@rq

I just looked at their stock movement from yesterday, what a dip!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ts+1k1p1w9v7

Speaking of McKiinsey and Accenture... Ooops...

"Gartner Shares Plunge Over 27% Despite Beating Q2 Estimates, Raising Buyback Authorization"

https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/movers/25/08/46871642/gartner-shares-plunge-over-27-despite-beating-q2-estimates-raising-buyback-authorization

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rq+1k1p1w9v7

@ev

CHROs too (or whatever flavor of a job title they came up with this month).

Useless, overpaid, weird. Know a bunch that don't even have people skills.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j0+1k1p1w9v7

@db

Plus, all of these McKinseys are arrogant to an extreme.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hz+1k1p1w9v7

They need to use AI to replace management, AI couldn't do any worse of a job than AK and Ginni have done, and it works 24x7x365 and for a lot less. Ginni didn't even know what "the Cloud" was.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ev+1k1p1w9v7

When it comes to companies like McKinsey and the negative impact they’ve had on the American workforce, I’m on Team AI if they are being negatively impacted

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e0+1k1p1w9v7

@db it should be "Burn Baby Burn" for both IBM and McKinsey leadership and consultants for the evil they have dispersed worldwide for the past 20+ years with their "outsourcing" ideologies and methods. It won't happen soon enough though.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @de+1k1p1w9v7

RE: McKinsey
I can't think of a more worthy company for AI to replace human consultants. Finally, their years of boilerplate BS advice will be revealed. Hopefully, they'll join IBM in the FADE AWAY section of the business world.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @db+1k1p1w9v7

[Full article linked in post @a9+1k1p1w9v7 quoted below].

Who needs Accenture in the age of AI?

The self-styled reinvention powerhouse faces its toughest job yet—remaking itself

By: Joseph Schumpeter
Jun 26th 2025

WHO IS consulting good for? Consultants, obviously. Chief executives, who can blame failure on bad outside advice and take credit for successful counsel. Also, for the industry’s one listed behemoth, its shareholders. Between the start of 2015 and the end of 2024 Accenture, which split off from its accounting sibling in 2000 and went public a year later, generated a total return (including dividends) of around 370%, handily outdoing not just the S&P 500 index but also Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, rival redoubts of advisory smugness. As America’s stockmarket climbed to an all-time high in February, the firm was worth $250bn, more than either investment bank.

Since then, however, investors have wiped some $60bn from its market value—and a self-satisfied smile off its face. On June 20th its share price tumbled by 7% following a disappointing quarterly earnings report. Revenue and operating profit both rose a touch faster than expected year on year, to $17.7bn and $3bn, respectively. American-government contracts took less of a hit than feared from the DOGE efficiency drive. But new bookings declined for the second quarter on the trot. Both one-off consulting projects and “managed services”, where Accenture runs certain corporate functions day to day on clients’ behalf, were down. The number of individual customers inking over $100m-worth of business with the firm in the previous three months dipped from 32 to 30.

Some of this is a temporary setback. Amid the fog of a trade world war, and of geopolitical ructions in the Middle East, many global companies are currently preoccupied with survival rather than “reinvention”, which is Accenture’s stock-in-trade. Still, the firm’s problems run deeper. Having made a fortune telling others how to adapt to newfangled tech, from the internet to cloud computing, it now faces the selfsame predicament in the age of generative artificial intelligence. As semi-autonomous gen-AI “agents” sweep the world, who needs consultants?

This is the uncomfortable question before Julie Sweet, Accenture’s boss since 2019. Her two-part answer has been to insist that clients will require as much help with gen AI as they did with earlier tech innovations, or more, and that Accenture is perfectly placed to provide it. Neither claim sounds persuasive.

It is true that plenty of multinationals can make neither head nor tail of gen AI. Ask most managers about the relative virtues of Claude Sonnet 4 and ChatGPT o3 and you get a blank stare. A recent survey by S&P Global, a data compiler, found that 42% of companies abandoned most of their AI initiatives. A year ago the figure was just 17%. Clearly, then, some hand-holding is in order.

But for how long? Accenture’s success was built on partnerships with a plethora of technology providers, whose often finicky products it has long helped clients select, put in place and maintain. All sides stress the strength of their enduring relationships. In November, for instance, Accenture and Microsoft added a “Copilot business transformation practice” to Avanade, their 25-year-old joint venture. In May the consultancy and SAP, a giant of enterprise software and another longtime collaborator, unveiled a new programme to help small but fast-growing companies “reinvent, thrive and grow” (in Ms Sweet’s words) and “move faster, operate more efficiently and scale with confidence” (in those of Christian Klein, her opposite number at SAP).

For all such public bonhomie, though, some of Accenture’s partners cannot wait to cut out the middle man. AI is being integrated into their offerings so that it works straight out of the box—and keeps working as AI agents automatically update and upgrade IT systems in accordance with users’ commands. Newcomers like Palantir are embedding their own engineers with customers. All this lets clients save money on Accenture consultants, in the blunt words of one supposedly friendly tech boss.

Already the pace of Accenture’s new gen-AI contracts is slowing, from $200m a quarter last year to $100m in the past three months—not exactly reassuring for what are the early days of a ballyhooed technological revolution. It implies that, for Accenture, “AI is not digital 2.0,” sums up Tom Rodenhauser of Kennedy Intelligence, which tracks the consulting industry.

Despite Ms Sweet’s insistence to the contrary, the AI age looks likely to belong not to enablers of technology like Accenture but to its originators. Consider the past decade. In the seven and a half years before ChatGPT introduced gen AI to the masses in November 2022, Accenture’s shareholder returns, of 200% over the period, and its future prospects, as measured by the ratio of its share price to forecast earnings, dwarfed those of companies such as SAP and IBM. In the two and a half years since, the tables have turned. Palantir, for its part, is worth $338bn, six times what it was just a year ago.

Accenture could have used its access to capital markets to invest in deep tech (which IBM, for example, has continued to do despite a pivot to consulting in the 1990s). Instead it opted to splurge on innumerable “tuck-in” takeovers of small consultancies. That includes maybe 50 ad and marketing agencies that, if Meta and Google have their way, gen AI is about to make obsolete.
Bitter Sweet

In an attempt to calm investors’ nerves, Ms Sweet has reorganised her firm around “reinvention services”. The new unit combines all of Accenture’s businesses into a one-stop shop to meet clients’ needs. It will be run by Manish Sharma, the well-regarded boss of Accenture’s American operations. This sounds an awful lot like, well, Accenture—and Mr Sharma’s new role like Ms Sweet’s old one overseeing the whole business. If the firm really wants to avoid being disrupted out of existence by AI, it may need some better advice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1k1p1w9v7

@OP

Did you see this other one?

Who needs Accenture in the age of AI?
The self-styled reinvention powerhouse faces its toughest job yet—remaking itself

https://www.economist.com/business/2025/06/26/who-needs-accenture-in-the-age-of-ai?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k1p1w9v7

Post a reply

: