Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Layoffs are a failure of management

From a post on LinkedIn:

Now I realize that the reason is because, as we are taught by Harvard Business School, layoffs are a failure of management. Ford created an entire design-thinking organization, grew it to scale rapidly, and failed to extract the value the department was providing. Instead of adjusting their plan, slowing their growth, or reallocating resources appropriately throughout the years, they did nothing. They kicked the can down the road.

They then made the managerial decision to conduct layoffs. A decision that Ford Motor Company continues to make repeatedly. Layoffs are not restructuring. Layoffs are not reorganizing. Layoffs are a last-ditch effort that should only be used under imminent circumstances. Layoffs should not be celebrated, in the stock market or otherwise.

They result in millions of dollars in hidden costs, including low morale and lack of trust for upper level management. And if there is anything that US auto manufacturers need in the changing competitive landscape, it is the trust of their employees.

by
| 1872 views | | 7 replies (last July 20, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1nGmW3Dl

7 replies (most recent on top)

@bnw

I (@lfw) expected lots of people disagree with me. The main deviation in opinions is centered at "when I did my job well".

The fundamental question is "when I did my job well", what is the difference does that make?

From my own experiences, 99% of Ford are followers, following the existing practices. 99% of the Ford resisted changes with the arguments that the changes are different from the present and past. 99% of Ford insist that changes must reproduce the present and past for the changes to be valid. At 30 years ago, these arguments are at least partially correct when Ford led the industry in Truck/SUV. For today, combined these means that 99% of Ford insist that the present bad results must be and will be reproduced in the future regardless, may be because you do your (bad) job so well.

Mown your lawn before you complaining about the weeds in your neighbors' yards. It is too late for many of you to think differently. May be you are a part of the reason that layoffs are happening.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tkf+1nGmW3Dl

I still think Wall Street has a lot to do with it. MOre money to the shareholders.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tlq+1nGmW3Dl

@lfw+1nGmW3Dl I disagree. Why should I bear the "blame" for layoffs, when I did my job well? I provided technical advice to managers, and most of it fell in deaf ears. I provided several viable solutions to some issues, and management chose the ones not in the list because there were not good solutions. What else should I do?

No, I am not to blame for anything wrong in this company, even less with the layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bnw+1nGmW3Dl

I do think all "employees" are responsible for Ford's failures. Management bears a significantly larger share.

Ford benchmarked Toyota, Mazda, VCC, JRL, FOE, and GM. Barely any benchmark results got into Ford's processes except the garbage from FOE. Why FOE? FOE brought in complexity. Management loves complexity. Complexity is great for powerpoint.

When earth continues to spin, Ford stood still for more than 30 years. Processes are out of date, people are out of date. Do you think you are not responsible for this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lfw+1nGmW3Dl

This post was from the wife of an 'involuntarily separated' employee. The irony is that she got a summer job with, of all companies, Boston Consulting Group. Remember them? It's possible the company that created the plan to eliminate her husband's job is her current employer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xki+1nGmW3Dl

Although layoffs are not unique, the automotive industry is cyclical, which used to be about every 10-11 years. In the last several years it has been every year, which is a sign of trouble. Apparently, we are no longer a cash cow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yuz+1nGmW3Dl

Layoffs aren't unique to automotive. They've been happening in lots of sectors, including "tech". Google, Amazon, Meta, ...the list goes on. As the post indicates, in many cases, its the companies' management that over-expanded when times were good, and have to react to reign in costs.

In Ford's case, I suspect JF just wasn't keen on Hackett's D Ford fiasco, and is now working to get rid of it. I doubt JF cares if peoples' lives & careers are thrown in the dust bin.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jvq+1nGmW3Dl

Post a reply

: