Thread regarding Charles Schwab Corp. layoffs

Fired for Negative Glint Survey

I was laid off two weeks ago due to organizational changes in our area. However, I later heard from a former coworker that our Director became aware of a negative Glint survey I had submitted, where I expressed concerns about our team being understaffed and overworked. I also noted that I hadn’t been receiving sufficient support from my manager.

I heard our Director has been intentionally searching for the people who have been bringing the reviews down


by
| 40 views | | 15 replies (last 4 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kn5rdyeh

15 replies (most recent on top)

does HR even look at them to identify where there might be a problem? I know people who are scared to answer honestly because of repercussions, and on the flip side there are people who answer honestly to point out where something could be improved. It seems like the scores have zero impact on compensation changes or promotions

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9p+1kn5rdyeh

I can guarantee you that the surveys aren't anonymous. They show by location at grade levels and the managers can identify you . Its just a sh---y system designed to target you . There aint any good ever getting from this useless survey

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2sn+1kn5rdyeh

@1br they can narrow down by location and grade level

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1za+1kn5rdyeh

Yes so not anonymous if they can track you down

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gc+1kn5rdyeh

@18c Being able to pull slices of data neuters anonymity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1d8+1kn5rdyeh

The post from the director is correct: they’re anonymous, however, some PLs can back into who scored what based on individual conversations and a little math.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1br+1kn5rdyeh

They are 100% not anonymous as I know two people who go in trouble for low scores. CS&S

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ae+1kn5rdyeh

Remember the scores from years ago.
https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1o1dyabh

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @198+1kn5rdyeh

I’m a director with two layers in my rollup and I swear on my existence Glint is anonymous. You can pull slices of data according to different filters like tenure ranges, location, etc. but if there are ever less than 4 respondents in a category it just gives you an “insufficient quantity of data” error. A leader with less than 4 directs can’t even see their report, it would just fold into broader averages. There’s also no place to type comments on the Glint survey it’s just clicking numerical scores to the questions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18c+1kn5rdyeh

Wow, this company is so toxic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yv+1kn5rdyeh

@kb

The surveys are deceptive. Glint’s go-to-market strategy is to manipulate them. They do this by framing questions, providing interpretations, asking questions that alter inputs, and offering numerous ways to excuse bad scores. We can identify who said what via writing style, raw comments, location and other metadata. No intelligent person should respond.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pv+1kn5rdyeh

Managers are smart enough to know who is not happy and behind poor glint scores though its anonymous

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ke+1kn5rdyeh

Can anyone confirm whether managers/directors know who submitted which glint survey? They say it's anonymous within a group of like 4 people so I usually submit fairly high scores or just skip the survey since I was always skeptical of the anonymity and it seems easy to find out but last year on one of the surveys I was sick of the management within the org and put pretty much the worst scores you could. Got laid off 2 weeks ago too. Surveys are a bunch of bs as if they think people actually put what they feel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kb+1kn5rdyeh

The only Glint survey response ANYONE should provide is NONE. Never, ever fill out the survey. A non response shouts louder than any score.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e6+1kn5rdyeh

Don't ever share at work. The company is not your friend, nor our your co-workers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1kn5rdyeh

Post a reply

: