Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Farley is scared of China πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³

Here is the cleaned-up version with each sentence on its own line:

It’s the most humbling thing I’ve ever seen.
70% of all EVs in the world, electric vehicles, are made in China.
They have far superior in-vehicle technology.
Huawei and Xiaomi are in every car.
They have facial recognition.
Cell phone technology.
Yes.
Yes.
Connected to their cell phones.
Yes.
You get in, you don’t have to pair your phone.
Automatically, your whole digital life comes.
Is mirrored in the car.
You have an AI companion that you can talk to.
Chat, ChatGBT equivalent in China.
All the automatic payment is already there.
You can buy movie tickets.
It has facial recognition,
so it knows who’s in which seat
and which media you like.
Wait, why don’t Ford cars have that?
Would you need to go with Apple or…
Yeah, because Google and Apple decided not to go in the car business.
And even beyond that,
their cost,
their quality of their vehicles is far superior
to what I see in the West.
I mean, we are…
We are in a global competition with China, and it’s not just EVs.
And if we lose this, we do not have a future at Ford.

Source: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNdmJUp7h/

by
| 1371 views | | 13 replies (last July 21) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k0cy2qjy

13 replies (most recent on top)

I guess other people want all the gizmos.

I just look at them as more stuff to break.

I just want a simple set of wheels to get me from point A to Point B with heat in the winter and air conditioning in the summer. I don’t need to pay for all the gizmos.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v9+1k0cy2qjy

@g4 you made good points about why EVs don't make sense I'm America. But you didn't acknowledge the real problem that American vehicles have inferior technology. They don't integrate with out phones and are mostly outside of our digital lives. That is why we will fail to compete. Think of 25 years ago, when most of us used America Online. AOL didn't fail because they didn't send out enough CDs, they failed because they didn't adapt to competitor technology. Our ICEVs are the AOL CDs of today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ts+1k0cy2qjy

@a2 China doesn’t have much low sulphur gas so emissions systems with catalysts like catalytic converters and lean NOX traps can’t be used. As a result ICE vehicles in China’s dense, populous cities create unbearable pollution. Petroleum is also a huge import for China, so substituting domestic coal for imported oil is a priority to improve the balance of trade. Electric cars powered by coal power plants outside the cities is a good solution for China, but not for the US where all gasoline is low sulphur, cities sprawl, population is smaller, distance between cities is greater and there is much less stop and go traffic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g4+1k0cy2qjy

@d3 Accurate attribution is rarely valued at Ford. One person does something extraordinary, management hands the attaboys out to who ever is convenient. It’s demoralizing, but the biggest problem is the business doesn’t know how to get things done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g2+1k0cy2qjy

There is no chinese in high level hiring. Why?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1k0cy2qjy

@b2

@b2

How do you not understand that this will sc--w us every...single...time? Intellectual property will vacate faster than you large pizza in moms basement. Talent is local in this country, we just refuse to pay for it. Its self defeating incompetence at the higher levels. Take a lesson from anywhere? Chinese companies have directives. They simply do the work. Government subsidies blah, blah. You do what management says, or you get fired. Management plans dont work? Management GETS FIRED. We dont fire the responsible management here, it just doesnt happen. The same people are allowed to make the same mistakes again. Only things that change is who takes the blame.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d3+1k0cy2qjy

@b2 Nice try. But you will always have Sh** managers and executives at the top, China or not!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c7+1k0cy2qjy

In times like these, it's important to stay nimble through process leadership.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bv+1k0cy2qjy

H-1Bs are hiring useless H-1Bs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1k0cy2qjy

We should be hiring more engineers from Chinese automakers if they are actually good but here we are hiring useless h1bs and silicon valley flunkies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1k0cy2qjy

@OP "Wait, why don’t Ford cars have that"? Because this is the United States of America where personal privacy and many other freedoms are not monitored because that would be not only an infringement on but also a violation of a US Citizen's constitutional rights. Count me out and KEEP IT THAT WAY!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1k0cy2qjy

lol you don’t need google or apple for that technology. Farley is clueless. Tesla will have all of that in the coming years and ford will still be trying to figure out how to make simple API calls.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1k0cy2qjy

Does China have cheap (in their economy) gasoline? The figures I have seen is that gasoline is about 8 times the price it is in the U.S. when the median income is factored in.

That’s why EVs make sense in China.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1k0cy2qjy

Post a reply

: