Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Pension Plan Issues and Discussion

Much discussion on the future of the Company Pension plan and which option to pursue (Lump Sum vs. Annuity)

I do realize not everyone is entitled to an AT&T Pension plan. For those that do, I thought I would post this summary if it may help.

You might review this article:

https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201601_cfpb_pension-lump-sum-payouts-and-your-retirement-security.pdf

There are PRO’s and CON’s on deciding on a Lump Sum vs. Monthly Annuity. Everyone’s situation is different with intangibles involved in the decision process. Choose wisely and visit with a Financial Advisor or start educating yourself on Retirement Planning.

Ask yourself what are your plans to generate a steady source of Retirement Income, outside of Social Security. Pensions were designed to help in that regard.

Lump Sum payments benefit the company on releasing them from future obligations, shifting the responsibility to you.

Also, every year the company must file a report to the US Department of Labor outlining the Pension plan financial specifics and health of the plans. There are multiple Pension Plans AT&T provides depending on the affiliate you are employed under. It is a very interesting report to read. All plans roll up under the Umbrella Corporate AT&T Pension Benefit Plan.

You can find the report at this location.

https://www.efast.dol.gov/portal/app/disseminatePublic?execution=e1s1

You only need to enter DATA on these two fields and then perform a search

Enter PLAN number as: 006

Enter EIN as: 431301883

A listing of filings will come up and you would review the last plan submitted for the Plan Year ending December, 31 2017

Also, the company produces a condensed annual report summary for the past 3 years (ANNUAL FUNDING NOTICE for the AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN). This report should be available on the Company Web site (or via Fidelity) under Pension Plan Documents applicable to the plan you fall under and should be showing a summary for Plan years 2015, 2016, and 2017. Data for the 2018 Year I believe will be available in October 2019 based on the Department of Labor filing dates submitted.

Also, these sites may also be of interest on the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).

https://www.pbgc.gov/

https://www.pbgc.gov/news/testimony

Corporations pay a Premium PBGC to fund this Agency Responsible for Insuring Corporate pension plans. The AT&T Pension plans are categorized as SINGLE EMPLOYER Plans.

There is always the option that the Company may terminate the plan.

There are two ways they can terminate the pension plan.

First, they can end a plan in a “standard termination,” but only after showing the PBGC that the plan has enough money to pay all benefits owed to participants. Under a standard termination, a plan must either purchase an annuity from an insurance company (which will provide you with periodic retirement benefits, such as monthly for life or for a set period of time when you retire) or, if the plan allows, issue one lump-sum payment that covers your entire benefit. The plan administrator must give advance notice that identifies the insurance company (or companies) selected to provide the annuity. The PBGC’s guarantee ends upon the purchase of an annuity or payment of the lump-sum. If the plan purchases an annuity for you from an insurance company and that company becomes unable to pay, the applicable State Guaranty Association guarantees the annuity to the extent authorized by that state’s law.

Below are links for issues on the State Guaranty Associations

(each State has their own guidelines, Coverages, Benefit Limits, etc)

https://www.nolhga.com/

https://www.nolhga.com/factsandfigures/main.cfm/location/stateinfo

Second, if the plan is not fully-funded, AT&T may apply for a distress termination. To do so, however, they must be in financial distress and prove to a bankruptcy court, or to the PBGC, that they cannot remain in business unless the plan is terminated. If the application is granted, the PBGC will take over the plan as trustee and pay plan benefits, up to the legal limits, using plan assets and PBGC guarantee funds.

Good Luck with your decision and hope this may have helped.

by
| 3411 views | | 11 replies (last February 19, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XELAZBs

11 replies (most recent on top)

I read the entire article mentioned above; my thoughts based upon having retired during the separations in March, 2015:

Once retired, protecting against the risk of losing the asset is the most important thing to know because you won't be getting it back again.

1) It was said the annuity doesn't go down. An issue with the annuity is inflation risk. Using this inflation calculator - https://westegg.com/inflation/ - and entering $50,000 and setting the start year to 2008 and the end year at 2018, you'll see an additional $9,604.04 would be needed to have the same purchasing power. You'll be falling behind if all your income is from the annuity. Another ten years and you may need to withdraw from other assets to make up the loss. BTW, health care costs have exceeded the normalized rate of inflation by as much as 4%, so that is 7% annually and you'll need even more income.

2) Again regarding the annuity, a comment on what happens if the federal government's Pension Corporation takes over. They will pay a MAXIMUM of $54,000/year as of 2018. If I wanted to generate the same amount of money, I'd need $1,350,000 earning 4%. However, if my lump sum is greater than $1,350,000, and I can generate 4% or more with an investment company, I see no reason to risk my entire pension with AT&T and also receiving only $54,000 with the Pension Corp. taking over. And they may decide I'm not even entitled to that.

3) The alternative to a pension annuity is a portfolio managed by an investment firm, perhaps like Fidelity or Vanguard, and the creation of a balanced portfolio of stock and bond mutual funds. Stocks provide growth to stay ahead of inflation. An example is the S&P 500 Stock Index which has grown an average of 6.8% since 1926 through all the depression and all the recessions. And bonds generate income, money you need for living. This combination reduces the risk of losing your assets or having your income eroded by inflation.

4) Is it risker to have an annuity or an investment at a company like Fidelity, or Vanguard? It's said never invest only in one company. I see that as being AT&T. I can diversify via mutual funds. Sure some will go down and other's up. But if one fund tanks, I have the remainder of my assets to carry me through.

5) If you're not near retirement, more than ten years away, you can afford the ups and downs of the markets. Actually, you want them to go down when you don't need the assets so you can buy more at lower price and with time, stocks have always gone up. If they never do again, then everyone will be complete broke and we'll be farming for food.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3exm+XELAZBs

The lump sum goes down but the annuity does not. Well played... just sorry you both work here, must make for painful dinners. Good luck

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2eav+XELAZBs

If you are lucky enough to have both spouses employed with a pension plan, I like that the article mentioned one should take the lump sum and the other could take the annuity. That is probably exactly what we will do since one of us gets the higher lump sum leaving by April 1, 2019 and the other will not, so could take the annuity since the lump sum will be substantially reduced by the time they get surplussed most like later this year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nop+XELAZBs

Thanks for posting. I am a fan of Dave Ramsey and agree with most of what he teaches around personal finance. This topic comes up often. He is almost always a "take the lump" guy. I read this article which provided some good arguments against Dave's advice: https://retiremitten.com/2018/07/18/disagreeing-with-dave-ramsey-regarding-the-lump-sum-pension/

At the end of the day, it's a personal decision as to what's right for you and your family...and there is no right answer for everyone...but after reading this I am leaning more toward a monthly pension as opposed to lump sum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pma+XELAZBs

From a previous post:

To end the 75% funding claim repeated from the news articles- No participant in any PBGC covered Pension Plan can get a Cash Balance payout if the plan funding level is below 80% per the Pension Protection Act of 2006. AT&T continues to payout millions to retiring employees that request the cash balance method of payment.

From The IRS Filing that AT&T is required to make yearly for the Pension Plan. I would imagine the wireless tracking stock is included here. I hope just because it says 75% in a news article someone might fact check it before you post it as fact. The Intern that wrote the article might not have passed math class.

Funding Target Attainment Percentage

2017 96.5%

2016 98.5%

2015 98.7%

Single-Employer Program Continues to Improve

PBGC’s Single-Employer Insurance Program covers about 28 million participants in more than 22,000 plans. Last year’s report projected the program could potentially emerge from deficit by FY 2018 and was likely to emerge by FY 2022. The program forecasts have improved, with a larger chance of emerging from deficit by FY 2018 and emergence likely by FY 2019. The projections for FY 2027 show a wide range of potential outcomes, including the possibility for future deficits that could range in excess of $100 billion, but with an average positive FY 2027 net position of $26 billion in future dollars ($20 billion in today’s dollars). Improvements in the program’s financial position over the 10-year period are due to the general trend of better funding of pension plans and projected PBGC premiums exceeding projected claims.

AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN AT&T Inc. 431301883 903-910-4201 Single-employer

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hsu+XELAZBs

@1lou, appreciated your post. As everyone with health concerns, children or even grandchildren are most vulnerable they should do what comes natural and feels comfortable.

For those of us that have side stepped those issue, and in a married couples position , a monthly annuity....flanked by two Social Security checks, pays the bills and lets the rest of our investments run their course. No guessing how to invest a lump sum into existing accounts, or searching for new ideas on where to invest.

We have 401K’s, we have IRA’s....and other taxable accounts, taking the Annuity brings to mind a Forrest Gump go too line....”Okay, one less thing!" And that’s exactly how we feel.

BTW, interest rates have a minimal effect on an Annuity monthly payout.

Good luck no matter which choice you make Grasshoppers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mxr+XELAZBs

Blah blah blah. Take the lump and roll into 401K.... don't be a dummy. You're 50 something, it's a couple hundred grand....why would you rely on T for the rest of your life? Take the money. Roll into your 401K. You'll be a millionaire. Live on the earnings. Leave something for your family.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bip+XELAZBs

To poster “1lou”, I share the same philosophy and financial situation and have also taken the annuity option. Thanks for sharing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yav+XELAZBs

roll it into your 401k

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kqj+XELAZBs

*There are PRO’s and CON’s on deciding on a Lump Sum vs. Monthly Annuity. *

The number one consideration, both for this decision and when to collect Social Security would be health considerations. And among this stuff is various annuities options, like 10 year certain, spousal considerations and so forth.

If the lump sum is rolled into a regular IRA, there is going to be mandatory distributions at 70½ or 71. If it is rolled into a Roth, there is going to be a tax bite right away.

I already have a Roth, and I have a 401K that I contributed supplemental contributions over the years. And I currently have no life shortening health considerations.

So, my roll of the dice was to take an annuity. Currently, I have not turned on Social Security. I lightened the load a bit at the 401K because cheaper tax brackets were available.

But health is still #1 consideration. Any issue there tilts the situation towards taking the lump sum. For instance, type 2 diabetes on average knocks 10 years off life expectancy. That's the kind of stuff that has to be thrown into the calculus.

And then we have a borrow and spend government. What's going to happen with inflation? How do they pay off the burgeoning national debt without inflation cheapening that debt?

Well, right now inflation is tame. And I've gotten a third of my lump sum out of them on an annuity, at a fairly low tax rate. We'll see where this goes insofar as inflation is concerned.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lou+XELAZBs

There are only Pro's eveything else is #fakenews, good riddance

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fxh+XELAZBs

Post a reply

: