Layers and layers of worthless VPs that have to be let go.
14 replies (most recent on top)
@a7 obviously the higher you go, the more chances to get laid off, especially if you don't really qualify, which seem to happen more often than we realize. An open question is if it's worth the risk. It may depend on your risk tolerance and how far your retirement is.
@f9 Too many Chiefs and too many H1B's undercutting US workers.
@b9 I wouldn't trust Lori to make me a chicken sandwich without ki-ling me.
The old west is a coming back
... in d Ian's in the dirt. Nothing the gov can do as busy at war. The boys in blue...the hoods in white....and snoop black gang in town
Who cares about the top... jack j ack.. the I d ian..
A classic problem of too many chiefs and not enough Indians.
@a7 it’s called the Peter principle and it’s rampant through tmo
Agreed! Org charts look as bloated as ever. Smoke and mirrors and pedicured, jazz hands.
Pick a VP, pick 100. They could all be let go.
Lori Ames needs to go
Who was let go now?
@a7 you’re right many were unqualified and put into those positions because they were good brown nosers. Instead of going through the proper hiring process this was the result. Sorry but I have very little remorse for those at that level. Most were making life changing salaries and bonuses and several are incompetent.
@a7 Eh, doesn’t make me sympathetic to the circlej--kfor the overpaid fat as--s at the top of this company.
A lot of these VP's or Directors could have stayed as individual contributors, but were encouraged, sometimes pushed to grow and step up. Many quality leaders were let go because of the coat reduction pressures and now individual contributors are asked to lead without any management oversight. You really never know which position / role could keep you safe.