Why Cisco why??????
Because Cisco and the ELT doesn't care about you as a person. Forget all the talk about "family". When a senior manager or higher dies or develops cancer, Cisco bends over backwards trying to show how much they care, but when the same thing happens to an individual contributor (IC), you hear nothing from Cisco leadership. Their team does what they can, but that it, it's just at the team level.
I don't know which is worse:
1) the announcement that LR's will happen during an earnings call followed by receiving a 1-on-1 meeting request a few hours later for first thing the next morning OR
2) the announcement that LR's will occur next month and having the uncertainty of losing your job hanging over you.
The first option is like ripping the band-aid off quickly, but it s—s if you've just made a significant purchase like a new car or took an expensive vacation. The second option gives you time to prepare for the band-aid to come off by putting off any large purchases or taking a nice vacation, but most of these large purchases can take several years to pay off, so you just keep putting them on hold because next year there's another LR.
I had a company tell me that they were closing their campus where I worked and gave us 10 months notice. In that announcement, they said that they were going to offer relocation to the new site in another state about 1000 mi away for the "engineers". About 2 months later, they started contacting engineers and managers that they were eligible to be relocated and keep their job. We had 60 days to accept the relocation package and make a "house hunting" trip to scout the new location, but you only got the trip IF you accepted the relocation.
They managed to avoid paying severance packages to about half the impacted employees because people who weren't offered relocation and those that didn't want to relocate away from friends and family had time to find new jobs and simply quit. Their severance package was 2 weeks, plus an additional 2 weeks and 1 additional week for every year of service if you signed the agreement not to sue them for wrongful termination/discrimination, so there was little to no incentive to hang around waiting for the severance package. While this was good for the employees who quit and left, it s—ed for the employees who hadn't found a new job yet or those that were taking the relocation because we had to pick up the work of the departed employees since all backfill hiring would take place in the new state.
When Cisco announced the '11 LR a couple of months before it occurred because they were offering the Early Retirement package, I started looking for work. Jobs weren't exactly plentiful, but there were openings. I took a month getting any traction on interviews, then had a few that didn't pan out, but luckily I had one that moved really slowly and ended up making me an offer about a month after Cisco LR'd me, so I only ended up using 1/6th of the LR package and banked the rest. Way better than the "rip the band-aid" off method as you end up using a lot more of the severance pay while looking for the next job. The time wasted from interviewing to the time the company makes a decision and gives you the paperwork to complete so they can perform a background investigation on you and the lead time for them to get you a PC and your accounts created, you've wasted a minimum of 4 weeks if not closer to 8.