Thread regarding Walgreens layoffs

Closing WARN loophole

Companies sc--w over the employees being laid off. State needs to seal the loophole by totaling number of people laid off yearly. Companies should pay penalty on top off penalty and still pay WARN pay if the total number exceeds allowed number and company tried to evade WARN pay at the end of year.

Using the loop hole may result in similar situation to opi--ds.


by
| 15 views | | 2 replies (last 28 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m4ymb1pb

2 replies (most recent on top)

@cz Post was about closing WARN loop hole. People will leave when they find another job but if the company wants to lay them off before that then WARN pay should be there. If you have issue with people affected getting WARN pay then you are a Jack a-s for writing the comment you did.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dv+1m4ymb1pb

How about have some pride and leave and get a job where you are at least somewhat respected. Walgreens is the worst, or at least one of the worst places to work at. For the people in the stores, why would you stay with a company that pays you $19/hour after being there 20 years, when they hire someone new for nearly that amount.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cz+1m4ymb1pb

Post a reply

: