Thread regarding 3M layoffs

SCIENTIST AND PRODUCT DEVELOPER SUES 3M FOR AGE DISCRIMINATION

WHEN YOU ARE GIVEN A "GREAT OPPORTUNITY" FROM YOUR LEADER, ASK YOURSELF IF IT REALLY IS AN OPPORTUNITY OR WHETHER YOU ARE BEING SETUP BY LEADERSHIP AND HR FOR A JOB ELIMINATION. THIS IS A PUBLIC CASE THAT PROVIDES INSIGHT TO HOW 3M OPERATES.

Dr. William Bedingham, a successful, dedicated 3M employee for over 35 years, has sued 3M in Ramsey County alleging he was selected for termination based on his age. Dr. Bedingham, who was 63 years old at the time of his termination, is represented by Lead Counsel Larry Schaefer at Schaefer Halleen, LLC, a Minneapolis-based Firm recognized nationally for its depth of experience in this field.

According to Mr. Schaefer, 3M knowingly and intentionally required Dr. Bedingham to exclusively work in a business area it knew would be eliminated to ensure that Dr. Bedingham would be impacted by a reduction-in-force ("RIF") – at great cost savings to 3M through reduced pension payments and salary. 3M engaged in this egregious action despite Dr. Bedingham's uniformly positive performance reviews and prolific accomplishments over the course of his career. His accomplishments include being principally responsible for over 100 patents in a variety of business areas, as well as being awarded the prestigious "Minnesota Inventor of the Year" and "Corporate Circle of Excellence" awards.

While 3M assured that younger, less qualified employees were insulated from the RIF by assigning them fabricated "critical maintenance" roles the day prior to the RIF was implemented, Dr. Bedingham was not afforded such protections. Despite such blatant discrimination, 3M continued to benefit from Dr. Bedingham's expertise, even after he was terminated, by requesting his signature on multiple patentable inventions that Dr. Bedingham had developed in recent years.

"We intend to hold 3M fully accountable for its treatment of Dr. Bedingham, and any other older workers who have been treated similarly by 3M," asserts Schaefer. "Every worker deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, especially when they near retirement age. We will not allow 3M to force workers into retirement in violation of Minnesota law," he added.

by
| 1741 views | | 10 replies (last April 25, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1sbtwxqz

10 replies (most recent on top)

I don't know about dogs, but there's a saying about the young person knowing the rules and the old one knowing the exceptions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jhy+1sbtwxqz

Except, a degree without experience is a blank slate, ready to be trained however management wants.

Meanwhile, what's that saying about old dogs and new tricks?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xrq+1sbtwxqz

This isn’t tough for young professionals just beginning their careers to understand. Nobody wants to work at a fast food joint when they have a degree in engineering. Unfortunately, a degree without experience is a piece of paper.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dgf+1sbtwxqz

Remeber the corporate call when a job elimination round was announced, during the good old days when there was some transparency. The chat feature for online was left on - several years ago. There were many comments made online by participants for all to see:

"JE the older people, they have pensions"
"We have families and mortgages - fire the people over 55"

  • . .

Needless to say, that was the last time that chat was left on during the all company meetings. Each individual's true colors flew bold and bright on that day. As you will see in the comments below, more true colors flying. Layoffs and promotions are part of life. Being JE selected because you are over 55 is sick. Bias is always wrong and 3M needs to stop a toxic culture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @boj+1sbtwxqz

“Older employees need to go”

If some of the younger folks would toughen up and stop acting entitled, the older folks wouldn’t need to spoon feed and babysit anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hcd+1sbtwxqz

Old employees need to go. I mean he was over 60 and still crying. We have a few of those in my function too! They just refuse to retire.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vhu+1sbtwxqz

why are you posting a story that's over a year old?

He just now found it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qgy+1sbtwxqz

I'm not saying that they didn't discriminate based on age in this case, but in my experience 3M is full of old guys who have risen past their level of incompetence.

Some fresh blood would do this company good.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iyo+1sbtwxqz

@bjy+1sbtwxqz

HR can be trusted and I'm sure you will never be set up. You should jump at the next 3M opportunity!

When I look up the case, it is still active. Good advice from OP but agree shouting is not necessary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oqr+1sbtwxqz

why are you posting a story that's over a year old?

AND WHY SO MUCH SHOUTING?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bjy+1sbtwxqz

Post a reply

: