@b1 I think you could go back further to PSO, who got the job (instead of Pat) based on what proved to be an illegal marketing scheme to prevent PC makers from using AMD.
He then went on to make a series of technology mistakes, maybe most importantly was to sell the ARM development group. That was based on a notion that x86 phones could ever compete with ARM.
He also turned down the offer to build iPhone chips, but that was likely not a serious offer from Jobs. Jobs just liked to pit people against each other. Not entirely clear Intel at that point could even make those chips, with factories & PDK highly optimized for x86.
But yeah, BK took it all a step further by letting Sohail convince him that all the EUV development which Intel had done was not somehow better than the ridiculous patterning scheme they had for 10nm. D'oh!
Pat may have been a better choice than PSO, but not sure the company was in a position during the BK years to make the product shifts that Pat would have wanted. Also, AI and GPU were not much of a thing back then, so not clear Pat would have pushed for those new markets.
The reality is that every CEO since Andy was merely a monopolist. None of them had the vision and certainty needed to enable the company to deal with the loss of market dominance, or even to keep it going.
The original sin was to stop ARM development, even though it risked taking sales from x86. That is all PSO.