I have been reading comments on here where people assume that when others are talking about DEI, they are referring to race. Fidelity has set up a culture where being a cookie cutter employee is accepted, but won’t help.
I have seen people who are really bad at their current role, they cause problems within the department or with business partners, don’t have a high school degree, but identify as “g-y” at work, but not home. This rep now works in a managerial-ish role now.
There are lots of other factors than race and to only use that as defending your point, well good job. You fit in the new culture of underperforming and just blaming something made up.
I’m against DEI because it caused a systemic problem where talented people were not acknowledged. There is a quota for positions. And people that don’t fit the DEI criteria are at a disadvantage. I’m against DEI within the firm because it didn’t help promote equality.