Thread regarding CDW layoffs

WARN Violation?

CDW let go of roughly 750 employees, with zero prior notice. I know that many are not getting 60 days of pay.

Is this a violation of the WARN Act? Or is there some loophole related to remote work and multiple offices that CDW is able to use as a defense?


by
| 1 view | | 6 replies (last 3 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kwjc0es8

6 replies (most recent on top)

@b0 My attorney is talking my case for free and 10 percent of anything we win above and beyond their offer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fm+1kwjc0es8

@b0 Pay it! I did during the last layoffs and they settled for more than I asked for and all legal fees. I am so glad I did. It protected my family.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fk+1kwjc0es8

@av Local market doesn’t seem to have free options. I’ve been quoted $295 to $750 for a severance review by reputable firms.

I’m in a place to pay either price if it’s worth it. The $750 does seem like they provide substantially more than the $295 firm.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1kwjc0es8

Every situation is unique. As a labor attorney, I will not be an ambulance chaser and recommend my services but I helped my brother with his case and he settled for a great deal more. There may be other factors like age, race, religion, s-xual orientation, who was let go versus who wasn't and other factors. Most labor attorney's will take your case for free and solely ask for a percentage of the additional monies they offer. Some may ask for a fee in advance but you will get that back in the settlement. Call and attorney now. It will be the best decision you ever made.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kwjc0es8

Labor laws are written like we’re all working at a single factory. They can get around WARN because not everyone reported into the same location. Our laws are totally outdated and there’s no protection, especially for remote workers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1kwjc0es8

it has to be at least 500 from one location, so yes they used sc-mmy tactics to avoid that

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kwjc0es8

Post a reply

: