Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Google scraps it diversity program, Is ExxonMobil next to comply with new government contractor rules?

Google scraps its diversity hiring goals as it complies with Trump's new government contractor rules
Story by MICHAEL LIEDTKE

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google is scrapping some of its diversity hiring targets, joining a lengthening list of U.S. companies that have abandoned or scaled back their diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

The move, which was outlined in an email sent to Google employees on Wednesday, came in the wake of an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that was aimed in part at pressuring government contractors to scrap their DEI initiatives.

Like several other major tech companies, Google sells some of its technology and services to the federal government, including its rapidly growing cloud division that’s a key piece of its push into artificial technology.

Google's parent company, Alphabet, also signaled the shift in its annual 10-K report it filed this week with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In it, Google removed a line included in previous annual reports saying that it’s “committed to making diversity, equity, and inclusion part of everything we do and to growing a workforce that is representative of the users we serve.”

Google generates most of Alphabet's annual revenue of $350 billion and accounts for almost all of its worldwide workforce of 183,000.

“We’re committed to creating a workplace where all our employees can succeed and have equal opportunities, and over the last year we’ve been reviewing our programs designed to help us get there," Google said in a statement to The Associated Press. "We’ve updated our 10-K language to reflect this, and as a federal contractor, our teams are also evaluating changes required following recent court decisions and executive orders on this topic.”

The change in language also comes slightly more than two weeks after Google CEO Sundar Pichai and other prominent technology executives — including Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg — stood behind Trump during his inauguration.

Meta jettisoned its DEI program last month, shortly before the inauguration, while Amazon halted some of its DEI programs in December following Trump's election.

Many companies outside of the technology industry also have backed away from DEI. Those include Walt Disney Co., McDonald's, Ford, Walmart, Target, Lowe's and John Deere.

Trump's recent executive order threatens to impose financial sanctions on federal contractors deemed to have “illegal” DEI programs. If the companies are found to be in violation, they could be subject to massive damages under the 1863 False Claims Act. That law states that contractors that make false claims to the government could be liable for three times the government’s damages.

The order also directed all federal agencies to choose the targets of up to nine investigations of publicly traded companies, large non-profits and other institutions with DEI policies that constitute “Illegal discrimination or preference.”

The challenge for companies is knowing which DEI policies the Trump administration may decide are “illegal.” Trump’s executive order seeks to “terminate all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs” and other activities of the federal government, and to compel federal agencies “to , combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.”

In both the public and private sector, diversity initiatives have covered a range of practices, from anti-discrimination training and conducting pay equity studies to making efforts to recruit more members of minority groups and women as employees.

Google, which is based in Mountain View, California, has tried to hire more people from underrepresented groups for more than a decade but stepped up those efforts in 2020 after the police ki-ling of George Floyd in Minneapolis triggered an outcry for more social justice.

Shortly after Floyd died, Pichai set a goal to increase the representation of underrepresented groups in the Mountain View, California, company's largely Asian and white leadership ranks by 30% by 2025. Google has made some headway since then, but the makeup of its leadership has not changed dramatically.

The representation of Black people in the company's leadership ranks rose from 2.6% in 2020 to 5.1% last year, according to Google's annual diversity report. For Hispanic people, the change was 3.7% to 4.3%. The share of women in leadership roles, meanwhile, increased from 26.7% in 2020 to 32.8% in 2024, according to the company's report.

The numbers aren't much different in Google's overall workforce, with Black employees comprising just 5.7% and Latino employees 7.5%. Two-thirds of Google's worldwide workforce is made up of men, according to the diversity report.

Associated Press business reporter Alexandra Olson contributed to this report

https://apnews.com/

by
| 2211 views | | 13 replies (last February 10, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jkdgyem3

13 replies (most recent on top)

Content hasn't been stripped from Exxonmobil.com. It's on the careers page

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @y6+1jkdgyem3

Tatoo’em

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rt+1jkdgyem3

To be fair to persons that earned their positions against all odds but for reasons beyond their control might be mistaken as DEI candidates, there should be “DEI” after the title of all DEI candidates.
This is just to show everyone the success of the DEI program while also clarifying the persons that did not need DEI to achieve their positions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fw+1jkdgyem3

A fear of every female and minority is that their mere existence labels them a DEI in the eye of any jealous or undervalued coworker. When it becomes this focused in politics, the average person’s unconscious bias is validated in thinking ‘maybe they don’t deserve it.’ Well, the population is 50% females and 50% minority, so there is at least a 1:1 chance that they deserve it as much as you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d8+1jkdgyem3

I was hired for my skills. The DEI was just a bonus. But what I’ve observed is many companies promote the ones who check the boxes based on like ability. Unfortunately, this makes DEI a place holder. If the person doesn’t mess up, they move on. That’s not fair for the rest of us.

DEI never helped me because 1) I question things, and 2) people tends to believe what they want to see and draw conclusions.

I’ve been accused of not doing my work even when I shouldered more than my share for the rest of the team. I’ve been told I’m too quiet, too outspoken, too angry, too nice, look too young, too old, talk with an accent, dress too casually, dress too provocatively, and the list goes on. And that doesn’t include the harassments and the creepy innuendos. Sometimes I have to work twice as hard to prove myself. How would you feel if your wife or daughter was treated this way?

Unconscious bias is strong in all of us.
It takes effort to recognize that in ourselves. If someone who looks and think different than you do a good job. Please support them. All we want is a fair chance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1jkdgyem3

Add legacy hires to the list.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1jkdgyem3

ExxonMobil has to think long term on DEI. American Presidents are only in office for four years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1jkdgyem3

@ax+1jkdgyem3 100% agree

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1jkdgyem3

Bravo! Let’s start hiring and promoting people based on their skills and talent and not their skin color and gender.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1jkdgyem3

@ar+1jkdgyem3 Safety culture? Have you been in Midland?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1jkdgyem3

Diversity programs, but also if OSHA is done, are we going to now have a loosey goosey safety culture? How is that going to play out? if the company walks back on it's core declared values... are the teams turn out to be white men only and are those white men going to get hurt at work because they are too manly to hold the hand rail?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jkdgyem3

Just look at the Exxon website - they’ve already stripped DEI content.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jkdgyem3

Nope too many DEI folks already hired that would get their pa-ties in a knot and XOM knowS better than everyone else. Got run out of Russia so let’s invest in another communist country like Ch8na. He-l we hire Communist!
We will loose assets and technology there also. India got busted buying parts for Russia yesterday so let’s get them to do engineering work. OBVIOUSLY they are honest and do good work. It’s almost comical. I really hope Xom gets some of that tax burden tariff for pipping local engineers and pemping foreign ones. An Xom communist hire actually came up with that idea. Go figure.

Some of the most ignorant managers that are pompous and arrogant in the world, that’s who “we are Xom is.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jkdgyem3

Post a reply

: