Thread regarding Fidelity Investments layoffs

Question about layoff rumor

Hi everyone. There’s a rumor I saw in a comment that Fidelity would be having another layoff, some time in Q2. The last layoff (per this source: https://riabiz.com/a/2024/3/12/fidelity-lays-off-700-not-for-costs-or-bad-performance-but-to-shift-headcount-and-hire-more-client-facing-and-tech-staff-touching-off-panic-posting-on-job-board ) indicates exactly as this says.

I saw Mark Zuckerberg announce a “performance based” layoff cutting the bottom 5%. That would su-k to be caught up in that, because if you get laid off from that, you could be looked at like some type of taint. In my opinion, Zuckerberg’s announcement was a di-k move, pardon my French.

I wonder if Abby Johnson would pull a move like that? From what I’ve seen in my (young) career, we see corporations follow the actions of really big corporations, but I don’t know if Fidelity would follow all these companies announcing performance based layoffs. I thought they were just trying to do a “silent layoff” by dynamically driving people to quit themselves. What do you all think?

by
| 2492 views | | 9 replies (last January 23, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jj33m69e

9 replies (most recent on top)

Managers should be the first laid off. They are the ones that sunk the ship.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pe+1jj33m69e

The layoff with 700 employees happened last year.

Honestly that should happen. Management has said multiple times that top performers have dropped to average because they saw how the inclusivity hires preform. They overhired during the pandemic and it’s still hurting the bottom line and high achievers were treated unfairly, thus causing them now to rebuild their brand.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n9+1jj33m69e

Fidelity has always been a place where the threat of a layoff is constant. It's been this way for 20 years or more. The amount of hiring that the firm has done since the last vbo in 2021 after covid was crazy. Now the chickens have come to roost. But make no mistake-the RTO policies and the non compliance of those policies have been and will be used to cut heads. Any excuse they can use to not pay a severance or vbo payout will benefit them

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ke+1jj33m69e

Layoffs are always performance vs salary. If you are low performer in high salary range , you will definitely be out. But if you are lower performer in lower salary range, you might stay until next one. Layoffs are ALWAYS about money. Work will be done with or without you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jv+1jj33m69e

@ad+1jj33m69e that's not true. i know for a fact that the previous layoff round had a completely intentional disregard for performance, role level, etc.

It was a cross-section RIF. Truly low performers may have seen a higher percentage, but there just weren't enough of those low performers to cover the layoffs needed. your manager has no idea how layoffs are chosen and is giving you false peace of mind.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eb+1jj33m69e

There have been layoff rumors since the last layoff. Fear of layoffs is company culture now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @by+1jj33m69e

@a2+1jj33m69e a presidents preference for inclusivity doesn't impact private companies. So it wouldn't be a driving reason for layoffs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jj33m69e

It makes sense there would be layoffs. There’s been bad press lately and we have weak management recently. We have a new president that doesn’t care as much about hiring for an inclusivity quota.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jj33m69e

Post a reply

: