@4kvi+1p1xs74X
The 1920s assumption was based on the fact that you don't understand the point of labs and the kind of services needed to grow a subscription business based around a complex technology.
Services execution speed != success.
Success == an enabled customer who can be successful without services.
@4lkv+1p1xs74X
it was reacquired by the mother ship because the stock was about to plummet.
Nice reading from your crystal ball there. The stock was hovering around $9-10 for a few months after a announcement for the next FY growth being 5% lower than markets expected. Yes Covid could have caused a liquidity problem and belt tightening, but no one knew that in 2019.
@4jbp+1p1xs74X
The market determined that pivotal was a failed company
Nope. The market wobbled after a company in the growth phase that high balled it's IPO lowered its projections for the next FY by 5%. If the market determined that Pivotal was a failed company the stock would have cratered, not halved. Pivotal's main stock holder (who was struggling with a large debt mountain and a recent US tax law change which treated debt less favourably) chose to cash out by having one of his other majority owned companies buy Pivotal.
@4cdp+1p1xs74X
If it didn’t happen already in four years with billions of dollars invested, it won’t.
I'd really like to get one of your crystal ba--s. Where did you buy if from? You seem to know that Tanzu hasn't grown (it has), how much VMware has invested and what will happen in the future.
Scooby Let's See Who This Really Is?.... Pat Gelsinger? I heard that you didn't like Rob Mee, but these sour grapes really run deep.