@2bgz+1gy5Clw9
I was thinking about this pivot the other day.
While it made sense at the time and in the short term to make GF profitable, etc.
It effectively put an expiration date on the company. Sure there will always be a market for this older technologies, but every year it will dwindle to less and less.
How long can GF go on milking these older techs? I have seen nothing about bringing in and starting up newer techs (newer then what we make now).
If an another industry does their own pivot (say automotive) to different tech node we will absolutely be decimated because we put all our eggs in one old basket. It’s not s matter of if that happens, but when and I have seen no plans or movement to give us the flexibility to pivot again if the need or times comes.
This really bothers me in that I have seen us or the leaders been absolutely dead wrong predicting customer needs and demands multiple times. Where we go very hard a certain design or feature being told 80% of the market is asking for it. Tremendous resources, time and effort are spent brining it up and qualifying it so it’s available to our customer base. Many other great things are out right dropped to focus on this feature/product. Only to find out after it all said and done and ready that actually only 5% of market wants it and 30% wants what we dropped to make the first thing happen. I have seen those forecasting misstep happen at least half dozen times in a few years. (Bad analysts and leadership??)
I guess my point or question is the pivot does but a life expectancy on us. Any idea how long? With no truly new things on horizon and we keep squeezing blood from old tech stones milking them dry. When does the downside of the pivot kick in.