Thread regarding IBM layoffs

More Layoffs l

Getting ready for another layoff. Seems to be all US based. Heard as much as 10 percent. My area was higher. Cloud is heavily impacted.

by
| 5702 views | | 19 replies (last February 27, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+13FETpSQ

19 replies (most recent on top)

GBS seems to be getting hit much harder than GTS

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3nut+13FETpSQ

but....but...but the cloud and the recent red acquisition was going to save us all!!! Maybe spending 35bn for nothing wasn't a good move.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jsq+13FETpSQ

@1ojy - can’t, they laid him off

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dfh+13FETpSQ

Question for the Watson AI:
What is the lowest % of personnel from the US so that the company still keeps the US look and feel?

If there is a team of 20 people in India/China/Mexico etc, led by 1-2 people in the US, the US folks are still the most visible and make the most of the decisions (and probably also most of the work...).
But if the amount of US workers becomes "homeopathic", will it still work? What if there is suddenly no US "face" to represent those non-US teams?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jhd+13FETpSQ

Lets put smart to work

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ojy+13FETpSQ

"IBM is changing course and transitioning from Services to cloud."

Sure. If you consider selling a customer a LinuxOne box or selling them an OpenShift license or having GTS install VMWare on a client's server or having GBS conduct an App Modernization Strategy study that includes a slide at the end of the Powerpoint that says "you should consider moving stuff to the cloud" then yes, IBM is "transitioning to cloud". This is all just a repeat of a few years ago when they slapped Watson labels on 30 year old legacy tech and called it "Cognitive" for financial reporting purposes, they just printed up new labels that say "Cloud" instead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1maw+13FETpSQ

I completely agree with you that IBM is restructuring to make the financial numbers. Please note IBM has gone all in on Redhat and the fortune 1200 crowd (think Z). Everything else doesn’t matter. IBM has determined they can make just as much profit out of Storage, Power, Legacy services via an IP deal. Like it or not, that’s the play that has been called. The final question is can IBM find a Willing buyer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1szz+13FETpSQ

IBM is not restructuring to return to growth and be a Cloud leader... IBM is restructuring because it needs to make sure it will make earnings the next 4 quarters. It is only a money game.

Wake up people!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fxe+13FETpSQ

Folks keep asking “will this impact GBS, or GTS, or Watson Health, etc etc. This is a complete corporate restructuring. IBM is changing course and transitioning from Services to cloud. They are not going to pick on one entity at the expense of the other. It’s across the board. I would expect the restructuring to replicate the revenue numbers of each division. GTS will take more cuts due to them representing more of the headcount and revenue to IBM. How do you change a corporate culture. You have to change the management team IBM is about to do that. It will hit all divisions. NOTE it has to be big enough to move the needle in wall streets eyes. There is a reason IBM froze all hiring and transfers. They are about to ask the fundamental question. “Do we need you” If no, you know the result. If yes, you will land on your feet and move forward. Welcome to the cloud era. IBM has finally decided to transform in a big way and muster out all of the folks who can’t transform.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uzc+13FETpSQ

As I read these reports. I can only imagine the incredible stress current IBMers are enduring while the company continues to implode. I left after 25 years as a programmer in 1992 when ranking and layoffs began. I thought the anxiety levels were high then, but I'm sure nothing compared to now. Good luck!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lrz+13FETpSQ

UK look to be getting culled again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pfk+13FETpSQ

iBM is using the PiP tactic to get rid of employees. GBS impacted as of yesterday

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wfx+13FETpSQ

Any word on GBS, or is this primarily a GTS focused initiative?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cjq+13FETpSQ

Because "cloud" is not a single job. Under "cloud" you have sales, marketing, development, consulting, services, etc. etc. Cutting half of "cloud" might mean cutting all the sales and marketing people but keeping development and consulting, for instance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hnd+13FETpSQ

I think of it this way - IBM is doing for us what we know we should have done for ourselves anyway: Leave this place. We all know IBM is crumbling. There hasn't been a good future here for years. In my org, the really good people left on their own years ago and IBM has since been randomly laying off the rest year by year. It's been a sinking ship for awhile now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @amm+13FETpSQ

We’ll know the answers by end of week.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ibo+13FETpSQ

Heard that 43% of GTS is getting hit and its global.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @obk+13FETpSQ

Not only US, also Europe is hit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qah+13FETpSQ

I've heard up to 35%. Lots of Cloud within GTS and GTS will be hit hard.
GLTA

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @akk+13FETpSQ

Thanks for heads off but how could be cloud heavily impacted if that is the future technology ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hmn+13FETpSQ

Post a reply

: