Thread regarding PepsiCo Inc. (Pepsi) layoffs

What’s Next for the DPA Organization & S6T ? Share Insights and Layoff Updates Here

Following the most-viewed PepsiCo thread to date - regarding G-yatri’s departure - which sparked widespread concern and criticism of DPA leadership team and their conduct (garnering over 13,000 views and hundreds of comments ! ) here is a brief summary of the three-page discussion key points.

Let´s continue the conversation on the future direction of the DPA and S&T in this thread and it does not concern G-yatri anymore .

In the other thread (Is G-yatri leaving Pepsico?) concerning PepsiCo’s Digital Products & Analytics (DPA) and S&T, employees have raised several notable issues, including:

  1. Leadership and Management Issues:

· Criticism is directed at G-yatri N. and her VP leadership team for fostering a toxic work environment and lacking clear strategic direction over the years.
· Allegations include overpromising results, mismanagement of resources, and pressuring employees to embellish business impacts to avoid poor reviews.
· Lack of ethnic and cultural diversity in senior roles was cited as example of ethnic favoritism.

  1. Toxic Work Culture:

· Reports of a culture marked by dishonesty, lack of integrity, and violations of the company's code of conduct.
· Employees express fears of retaliation for voicing concerns, with some stating that those who spoke up were either laid off or forced to resign.
· Across three pages of comments from S&T employees numerous concerns, including HR complaints, flagged about conduct of VP leaders predominantly from software engineering, UX design, digital product delivery...
· Shady tactics of lying about and badmouthing people of non Indian background.

  1. Questionable Financial Practices:

· Claims of excessive spending on contractors and projects without clear accountability or measurable outcomes.
· Concerns about offshore teams' frequent travel offsetting cost savings, questioning the effectiveness of the offshore model.

  1. Diversity and Inclusion Concerns:

· Discussions around perceived favoritism and lack of diversity within leadership roles.
· Some comments reflect tensions regarding the representation of Indian nationalities in leadership positions, highlighting a need for more inclusive practices.

  1. Calls for Organizational Change

· Employees urge senior leadership, including A-thina K. to address those issues promptly.
· Suggestions include conducting independent audits, reevaluating leadership appointments, and implementing structural changes to restore trust and accountability.

What´s Next. Any intel to share?

by
| 8989 views | | 32 replies (last June 30) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jwekvqdm

32 replies (most recent on top)

How come bad / incompetent management and management culture is never an excuse?

"PepsiCo now expects flat core constant currency EPS growth, citing rising supply chain costs, particularly from tariffs, and continued weakness in consumer demand"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4sj+1jwekvqdm

They’d be doing you a favor if they let you go from DPA circus. I was laid off last year. Now I’m working at a better company, with a better manager, better pay and benefits, and I actually feel appreciated. Yes, workplaces like that do exist. And yes, PepsiCo is one of the worst. I understand the fear. I felt horrible and scared when I was shown the door. But it turned out to be the best thing that’s happened to me in years.
I left DPA (S&T) last year, and could not be happier today. Sick, toxic environment - exactly opposite to what Pepsico brand projects to consumers! There is something seriously wrong with Pepsico, considering all the comments on this forum here.
No wonder the company is on the downwards trajectory. For its Q2 2025 analysts expect PEP to report a non-GAAP EPS of $2.03, down 11% from $2.28 reported in the year-ago quarter. Instead of the previously projected mid-single-digit growth, PepsiCo now expects flat core constant currency EPS growth, citing rising supply chain costs, particularly from tariffs, and continued weakness in consumer demand.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4rv+1jwekvqdm

Wow this forum is an intel goldmine! All the things we have been thinking about - but afraid to say at loud in Purchase!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3vm+1jwekvqdm

DPA, a unit under Strategy & Transformation, was supposed to lead the charge on digital transformation and boost PepsiCo’s digital capabilities. But instead, under the failed leadership of the notorious G-yatri and her infamous VP leadership team, it turned into a complete mess. Over the years, the group burned through company resources and money without delivering real value. There was barely any proper planning nor strategy, just a lot of shady practices and backdoor deals that seemed to benefit a few sketchy VPs.

The whole thing became more about crafting a nice-looking narrative than actually doing meaningful work. Blame-shifting, incompetence, and questionable behavior became the norm, and it’s no surprise that frustrations finally boiled over at this site. From design to delivery DPA has been a failed venture! And the diagnosis should start from its remaining VPs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gg+1jwekvqdm

The original sin when setting up the DPS/ DPA was hiring leaders without integrity - people who only look out for how to fill their own pockets and push their careers forward, without regard for long-term consequences for Pepsico or what’s happening to their teams. A mentality straight out of the Indian caste system: ‘I’m a VP, so whatever you say is worth nothing, just do what you are told to do and stop asking questions …’. Fcuk Voice Your Opinions Fearlessly ! . That started from G-yatri and followed with VPs appointed by her .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @33d+1jwekvqdm

@285 I doubt Athina will take any action, as this reflects directly on her leadership. She’ll likely try to sweep it under the rug, similar to how Vikram’s significant spend was handled during her tenure. She may not even realize how badly things were mismanaged before — it’s possible that G-yatri and Vikram were simply executing her direction.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2px+1jwekvqdm

Completely get rid of DPA, there is no clear vision, and it seems like the scope of the project gets wider and wider each day. Nobody truly knows what they are doing! On top of managing a group of stakeholders that also grows by the day. Gheyatri completely fcked this one up!

DPA was a blackhole for money under her watch. There were contractors collecting 500k a year working on ghost projects that could not be accounted for in AOP or any cost center.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2p9+1jwekvqdm

DPA has lost credibility … unlikely PEP sectors would want to pay in 2026 for that mess G-yatri left behind.
Too expensive, too inefficient, expensive ghost senior roles, lack of transparency in budgeting and planning , poor delivery.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @285+1jwekvqdm

@1dh I hear next wave is coming end of June. June 30th - last Friday of the month! Things are heating up.
Let’s see…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yx+1jwekvqdm

To improve their OHS scores, DPA and Data Engineering leveled up a lot of folks, several of them are undeserving. But who cares as long as it results in a great OHS score for leadership

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dz+1jwekvqdm

@1dh there is Jeff Jackson! . very good leader… benchmark way too high for other DPA leaders!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dj+1jwekvqdm

@109 “Yeah, gotta say I agree with comments below - there’s definitely some shady stuff goin on with that guy runnin the UX team, and a couple other folks in DPA leadership too. But hey, not all bad - there’s still a few good people up there in DPA VPs , let’s be fair!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dh+1jwekvqdm

@11e Workplace mobbing and bullying is a form of psychological harassment that has, unfortunately, become normalized across DPA. It involves an individual or group repeatedly and systematically targeting someone with negative and hostile behaviors. These may include gaslighting, denying previously agreed-upon tasks or objectives, and undermining the individual’s capabilities in public settings, team forums, or in interactions with stakeholders outside of DPA . This can include actions such as gossiping, spreading rumors, isolating the victim, undermining their work, and engaging in verbal or non-verbal aggression. The purpose of mobbing is to demean, discredit, and ultimately force the targeted individual out of their position or the organization, especially when their competence or integrity is a threat to this or that VP .
Shady tactic so common across DPA ´leaders´.
I´d prefer not to automatically link it to ethnic background, however I leave it for your reflection...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18d+1jwekvqdm

@v8 When you’re stuck in a toxic workplace like DPA, you don't think clearly. You doubt yourself. You freeze. You forget things that matter. But if you want to get out, protect yourself, you need to start writing things that happen at work down.Here’s why:

  1. It helps you see that you’re not the problem.
  2. Without it, we’re relying on memory which can be shaky under stress.
  3. When you leave and start telling yourself it “wasn’t that bad”, your notes will remind you that it was.

If this is happening to you, here’s what to record:

👉 Date – When did it happen? --> Example: “Monday 10 June, 2025.”
👉 Description – What happened? ---> Example: “My manager told me I was ‘too sensitive’ in front of the whole team after I raised a concern.”
👉 Who was there – What are the names and job titles of the people who were there? ---> Example: “Sarah (Manager) and Jason (HR)"
👉 How it made you feel – What emotions did you experience? ---> Example: “I felt embarrassed and humiliated. I cried in the bathroom afterward.”
👉 Proof – Do you have emails, screenshots, texts, audio recording, Slack or Teams messages to back up what you are saying? --> Example: Screenshot a Slack message where your manager says, ‘You’re lucky to still have a job here.’ (Keep them somewhere safe, not on your work computer.)

You don’t have to decide today if you’ll take legal action but your notes could be the difference between being believed and being dismissed at Pepsico.

If you are asked to participate in a workplace investigation, remember one thing. They often aren't about protecting you. They're about protecting the company.

Here’s why:

  1. If leadership doesn’t want change, nothing will change.
  2. The goal is often about assessing legal risk, not fixing the culture or supporting you.
  3. You’re expected to trust a system you’re not allowed to question. (They’ll call it “fair” while controlling every part of it behind closed doors.)
  4. Retaliation at Pepsico happens all the time and they rarely admit it.

Toxic workplaces want you to doubt yourself. Because if they make you believe that you're the "problem", you probably won’t:

  1. Speak up about it
  2. Keep detailed records of bad behaviour
  3. Look for new role
  4. Get legal advice
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11e+1jwekvqdm

@zm agree, l’ll tell ya what, AA is def one conniving VP over at DPA. Too many HR complaints, and he was often a slippery character; undermining both G-yatri and A-thina. Another example of HR droppin the ball on properly vetting G-yatri’s leadership hires at PepsiCo!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @109+1jwekvqdm

@zc I’m wit’ you — this dude’s a prime example of all the messed-up stuff goin' on with DPA leadership. What’s it say about the company when they bring in somebody this unqualified to run a design team? No clue how to plan or communicate, shady as he-l, and always actin’ outta pocket. Whole thing’s a joke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zm+1jwekvqdm

Mkt cap of $178B ( KO is $308B), stock at $129, YTD return negative 23%, everything is going backwards, a lot of execs need to be flushed, starting with Ramon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vb+1jwekvqdm

and PEP stocks drop further to 129$ today - lowest since Feb 2021! Another sign for 'a vert bright future' for the company with so many internal problems. I doubt A-thina has what it takes to change DPA and S&T for better! Does she?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v9+1jwekvqdm

@jn I'm happy I managed to move outside of S&T. DPA was a horror show, and I agree with comments about DPA leadership here. G/yatri was not the only problem, her VPs should be gone as well! Some shady, vicious folks still running DPA circus

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v8+1jwekvqdm

@jn Speak of audit. Does that dept even exist anymore?? I’ve never been in a corporate organization where audit was so non-existent. I need to be part of that group of nothing here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m3+1jwekvqdm

@dh Let’s be frank — the DPA model has failed across the board. The organization is burdened with too many L-level senior roles with diluted responsibilities and little business value, delivery managers who lack clear understanding of project scope and possess limited knowledge of agile best practices, and DPA VPs encouraging teams to overestimate resource needs in order to secure larger budgets for their units.

There is no proper oversight nor audit of how funds are being allocated and spent. And whats with having so many design directors to design data dashboards — seriously, DPA is not delivering highly complex, consumer-facing digital products that drive revenues for PepsiCo! It’s absurd!

It would be more cost-effective for PEP sectors to engage local agencies rather than navigating the inefficiencies of the DPA org structure and hoping for the best!
It’s madness! The dismissal of G-ayatri only scratches the surface of the underlying issues. Let’s see what happens next, otherwise this madness will only continue…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jn+1jwekvqdm

@en To date, opportunistic and vicious individuals have prevailed over competent ones across DPA leadership. It remains to be seen whether A-thina has the resolve to drive meaningful change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jd+1jwekvqdm

@ee No longer laying off....they're just outsourcing. The suppliers are making a mint off of PepsiCo.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @en+1jwekvqdm

@dh more layoffs coming in S&T for sure, no surprise there, it is expected!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ee+1jwekvqdm

@a1 Some of the DPA VP roles were not funded through specific projects and are instead funded under DPA operating costs. Given that there is hardly any business justification for the DPA unit to continue in its current form beyond 2025, it is a matter of when, not if, those VP roles will be phased out - with farewell discussions taking place with HR sooner than later.

It is unlikely that A-thina would choose to maintain the current DPA structure, considering the reputational damage and negative perceptions that have developed under G-ayatri’s leadership. She is well aware of all the complaints raised against DPA VPs in the recent years .
A lack of decisive action on her part will only reinforce and perpetuate toxic behaviors across S&T.

It is in her best interest to make a clean break. Ultimately, she bears responsibility for hiring G-yatri and for allowing an additional year of further disruptions, chaos and inefficient use of PEP funding under DPA!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dh+1jwekvqdm

@bx they will never learn their lesson following the Indian invasion cesspool prevailing right now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1jwekvqdm

@br Ram K

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1jwekvqdm

Who’s the next CEO of PepsiCo?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1jwekvqdm

@a2 lol They also have an interim reporting for InfoSec. Also, Global Procurement. Looks like a trend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jwekvqdm

Spot on! I could not bother reading all 3 pages of comments in the other thread!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jwekvqdm

for now just interim reporting to Athina of some of the questionable folks called DPA leaders.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jwekvqdm

Wow , 13,000 views ! what an accomplishment G.
Makes sense to continue in a new thread. Any news on more DPA layoffs coming soon?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jwekvqdm

Post a reply

: