thanks for posting a link to the filing. i have been wanting to read it for myself.
my takeaway is that if lowes didnt practice a policy of abuse of their workforce then this lawsuit doesnt happen. i am talking simple respect. if they didnt make it so bloody obvious that all they care about is shareholder and executive greed, and if they werent constantly yanking everyone chains when it came to continual layoffs and job title and responsibility changes...this lawsuit doesnt happen.
people are tired of corporate abuse and its going to continue to grow this tit-for-tat mindset. youre going to get yours? well then im going to get mine!
obviously theres a case to be made here....no matter how mundane these task or how few minutes it takes to do them individually. I have long argued that no retailer can make you, much less, hold you accountable for driving your car around the store before or after your shift. but store management always makes a point to tell you what a priority it is! the fact also remains this is the one time they WANT you to investigate for crime and get involved with the criminal while in the act...is it any wonder that youre off the clock when it happens?!
the part about not being properly relieved of job responsibilities during a lunch break is actually much greater than the lawsuit alleges. almost a shame it doesnt spell it out in greater detail. the minute you attempt to turn off their ability to contact you when an underling needs something or a superior wants something and all hell breaks loose. coverage is always so thin and it forces pretty much any employee at a retail store to be on the ready.
in the end if lowes loses they will take it out on their employees. lowes like all big retailers refuses to learn their lesson and treat people better. these kinds of class actions will keep going up.