I’ve noticed on several places on this board, when people asked how is the company planning to produce better results with a lesser headcount and less locomotives in operation, some folks replied that they see better efficiency in longer trains and better freight management.
While that may be true to a degree, I ask who prevented them from making longer train compositions before? If that was such a brilliant idea why didn’t they do it before? On the other hand, fewer locomotives in operation means the company loses the agility of reacting to certain orders which I see as a big area in which UP loses money.