Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

HES Function - What is Plausible Deniability?

Plausible deniability is the ability of people (typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command) to deny knowledge of or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by others in an organizational hierarchy because of a lack of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved in or at least willfully ignorant of the actions. In the case that illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking officials may deny any awareness of such acts to insulate themselves and shift blame onto the agents who carried out the acts, as they are confident that their doubters will be unable to prove otherwise. The lack of evidence to the contrary ostensibly makes the denial plausible, that is, credible, although sometimes it merely makes it unactionable. The term typically implies forethought, such as intentionally setting up the conditions to plausibly avoid responsibility for one's (future) actions or knowledge. In some organizations, legal doctrines such as command responsibility exist to hold major parties responsible for the actions of subordinates involved in heinous acts and nullify any legal protection that their denial of involvement would carry.

by
| 1731 views | | 5 replies (last March 4, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XMyBZGx

5 replies (most recent on top)

This looks like someone just cut and pasted a Wikipedia definition. Wow, that really takes a lot of talent. No wonder you are searching the layoffs site for answers. You have no clue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8zfb+XMyBZGx

You would expect Chevron PGPA to realize that the url their using goes right back to Chevron. I would expect them to take a higher road.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jox+XMyBZGx

HES is fu*ked. The empress may be in trouble.

In the US, plausible deniability is also a legal concept. It refers to lack of evidence proving an allegation. Standards of proof vary in civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, the standard of proof is "preponderance of the evidence" whereas in a criminal matter, the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt". If an opponent cannot provide evidence for his allegation, one can plausibly deny the allegation even though it may be true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sys+XMyBZGx

Post a reply

: